Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M56 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 25, 2009, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of canrenone, nikethamide and a metabolite of nikethamide. The substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had intered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport organizations.
2. All the results obtained at the event on April 25, 2009, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M55 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 11 and 18, 2009, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The samples showed the presence of a metabolite of nandrolone. Nandrolone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits in writing the use of nandrolone.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. All the individual results obtained are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M54 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on March 21, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of metabolites of metandienone, a metabolite of nandrolone, 17α-methyl-5β-androstane-3α,17β-diol and 17β-methyl-5β-androst-1-ene-3α,17α-diol. These substances are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits the use steroids.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport organizations.
2. All the results obtained at the event on March 21, 2009, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M53 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 4, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of furosemide, a metabolite of stanozol and a metabolite of drostanolone. Furosemide, stanozolol and drostanolol are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport organizations.
2. All the results obtained at the event on July 4, 2009, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M38 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on January 18, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication containing the prohibited substance to treat high blood pressure. Although a medical justification is needed to use this drug, her medical file showed enough evidence about her condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (a warning) of March 24, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M35 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on February 14, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of budesonide. Budesonide is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication containing the prohibited substance to treat a chronic rhinitis allergy. The use of this medication was mentioned on the doping control form. However the administration of glucocorticosteroids needs a medical justification.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year
2. The decision (acquittal) of May 19, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M25 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on January 18, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication containing prednisolone to cure a ear, nose and throat infection. His mother, a physician, had provided the prescription. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (six months period of ineligibility) of March 24, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 30, 2008 a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. These are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used medication containing prednisolone and being metabolized into prednisone. He claims therapeutic reasons for the use of it to treat rhinitis and acute sinusitis. The disciplinary committee of the FFHG at first made the decision on March 18, 2009, for a period of ineligibility of one year. But later the appeal committee of the FFHG changed the decision on June 5, 2009, into a warning.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one month in which the respondent can't take place in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The decision (a warning) dated March 18, 2009, from the appeal committee of the FFHG should be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and the decision of March 18, 2009.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M13 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 6, 2008 a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used cannabis in a recreational setting during a concert. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the respondent can't take place in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The decision (a warning) dated March 18, 2009, from the disciplinary committee of the FFHG should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of September 19, 2009, when the new season for this competition of 2009/2010 is starting.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M05 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on May 17, 2008, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body. But it is likely to presume that there was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFHB.
2. The decision, dated March 23, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFHB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.