In June 2013 the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the cricket player Pradeep Sangwan after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Stanozolol.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the BCCI Independent Anti-Doping Tribunal.

The Athlete gave a prompt admission, stated that the violation was not intentional and probably caused by the fat burning pills he had used to reduce weight. He had not received formal anti-doping education and he couldn't read the BCCI anti-doping information because it was in English and not available in Hindi.

The Tribunal accepts the Athlete's explanation and that he acted with No Significant Fault or Negligence without intention to enhance sport performance.

Therefore the BCCI Independent Anti-Doping Tribunal decides on 18 October 2013 to impose a 18 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the samplecollection, i.e. on 6 May 2013.

In November 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Adrian Frȋncu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 19-norandrosterone (nandrolone).

Therefore on 15 December 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In October 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Alexandru Ballai after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance drostanolone.

Therefore on 15 December 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In October 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Veronica Popescu after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance propranolol.

Considering the circumstances the ANAD Sanction Committee decides on 15 December 2008 to impose a reprimand on the Athlete and a warning to apply for a TUE.

Related case:
ANAD Comisia de Apel 2009_01 Christina Andrei
January 19, 2009

In September 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Cristina Andrei after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 19-norandrosterone (nandrolone).

Therefore on 17 November 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In September 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Emile Marius Giurgiu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

Therefore on 17 November 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In September 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Marius Mitrache after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

Therefore on 17 November 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In September 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Lucian Doru Pantea after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

Therefore on 11 November 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

In June 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Simona Vintila after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance sibutramine.

The Athlete stated she used the natural product for her health and without intention to enhance improve sport performance. In support her medical doctor provided a statement.

The Committee considers exceptional circumstances in this case and the Athlete’s lack of significant fault or negligence. Therefore on 3 October 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a reprimand on the Athlete.

In June 2008 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Florin Alexandru Stan after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances cannabis and metandienone.

Therefore on 10 September 2008 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.