Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football, FFF) charges respondent M56 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 21, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body. On february 24, 2009, he had received also a sanction for the use of cannabis (period of ineligibility of 2 years).

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competitions and sporting events organized or authorized by the FFF.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the earlier decision (period of ineligibility of one year), dated December 16, 2010, from the disciplinary committee of the FFF.
3. The earlier decision dated December 16, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFF will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M55 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a weightlifting event on June 19, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of methylhexaneamine, boldenone or its metabolites and metandienone or its metabolites, they are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits to use of product for fast recovery three days before the weightlifting event.The amount and nature of the supplements he used will count for the sanction.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility for four years in which respondent can't take part in competitions and sport events organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC as pronounced by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

The Ufficio di Procura Antidoping (UPA), the CONI Anti-Doping Prosecution Office has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Allessandro Colò after his A and B samples, provided in Mexico on 25 April 2010, tested positive for the prohibited substance clenbuterol. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard by the UPA.

The Athlete stated that the positive test was the result of the contamination of meat he had consumed in the hotel in Mexico due to the illegal use of clenbuterol on Mexican farms. The Athlete argued that he took every precaution to avoid problems related to food during the competition in Mexico. Therefore he choose to stay in a higher level hotel in Mexico to avoid problems with hygiene en contamination, including food.

Considering the circumstances the CONI National Anti-Doping Tribunal concludes that the Athlete has no significant fault or negligence in this case and decides to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on 25 May 2010.

Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football, FFF) charges respondent M53 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 21, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competitions and sporting events organized or authorized by the FFF.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the earlier decision (1 months of ineligibility), dated June 30, 2010, from the disciplinary committee of the FFF.
3. The earlier decision dated June 30, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFF will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Pétanque Federation (Fédération Française de pétanque et jeu provençal, FFPJP)) charges respondent M52 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on June 12, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat high blood pressure. This medication was the cause of the positive doping test. Medical statements to prove this condition are provided.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Contact Sport and Associated Disciplines (Fédération Française de Sports de Contact et Disciplines Associées, FFSCDA) charges respondent M50 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a muaythai event on April 3, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed the presence of a metabolites of stanozolol, metabolites of metandienone and trenbolone. Al these substances are prohibited substances according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent didn't give any explanation for the positive result of the doping test. The number and the nature of the prohibited substances are taken into account to determine the sanction.

Decision
1. The sanction is a four years period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSCDA or related federations.
2. The decision (peridod of ineligibility of six months) of September 7, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSCDA will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced with the period already served by the decision of September 7, 2010.
4. The results obtained at the event on April 4, 2010, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes will be withdrawn.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In February 2009 the Federazione Ginnastica d'Italia (FGI), the Italian Gymnastics Federation, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andrea Gaddi after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cocaine.
After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard by the Ufficio di Procura Antidoping (UPA), the CONI Anti-Doping Prosecution Office.
Considering mitigating circumstances the FGI Federal Justice Commission decided on 9 December 2008 to impose a 14 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension.

Hereafter WADA appealed the FGI decision of 9 December 2008 with the Tribunale Nazionale Antidoping, the CONI Anti-Doping Supreme Court. WADA requested to set aside the FGI decision and argued there were no grounds to impose a less severe sanction on the Athlete.

The Tribunal concludes that the Athlete failed to show how the prohibited substance came into her body. Therefore the CONI Anti-Doping Supreme Court decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the previous FGI decision, i.e. 9 December 2012.

Facts
French Federation Motorized Ultralight Glider (Fédération Française de Planeur Ultra-Léger Motorisé, FFPULM) charges respondent M49 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on May 13, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on indapamide. Indapamide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent uses medication against high blood pressure, this medication is the cause of the positive test. He has medical statements to prove this fact, also regarding his age and being a recreative player there is no reason to use dope.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

« non bis in idem » wordt wel genoemd maar niet toegepast

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M48 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on May 8, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medicine against high blood pressure from which he suffers since 2008. He has a certificate from his physician to state this fact. However the nature of the prohibited substance and the level on which the respondents takes part in competition it is necessary to impose a sanction.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of ten months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFHB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Pétanque Federation (Fédération Française de pétanque et jeu provençal, FFPJP)) charges respondent M47 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on June 20, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of heptaminol. Heptaminol is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat a pathologic decease from which she suffers for years, she has 2 medical certificates to prove her condition. She used the medication to stimulate the bloodflow to the lower limbs. Also because of her age there is no intention to boost her sport performance.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.