AFLD 2011 FFC vs Respondent M121

15 Dec 2011

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M121 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on July 3, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of triamcinolone which is regarded as a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Triamcinolone is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat an inflammation of a dental implant this medication was the cause of the positive test. He has a document to prove this, but it's without a date. He ads that he is not a professional but taking part in competition for leisure.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC and related French sport federations.
2. All the results obtained at July 3, 2011, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFC vs Respondent M110

10 Nov 2011

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M110 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on March 1, 2011, samples were taken for doping test purposes. Respondent had tried to falsify the codes of the bloodsamples. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is regarded as a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
At the hearing the respondent had denied he tried to falsify the codes of the blood samples. But later confesses he had taken intra-muscular injections with the prohibited substance twice in 2003. He tried to enhance his sport performance to become a professional in his sport and hopes to be able to continue as an amateur.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCC as pronounced by the decision, but extended to related French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification and it will end as pronounced in the decision dated June 29, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FCC.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFC vs Respondent M08

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M99 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on May 22, 2012, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on the prohibited substance betamethasone, ephedrine and amphetamine which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substances had entered his body. Due to the number and nature of the prohibited substances it is regarded as aggravating circumstances.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestions of the FFC, equal to the decision dated October 28, 2010 of the appeal committee of the FFC only extended to all French sport federations.
2. The decision will start at the date of notification, it will last as dertermined by the decision dated October 28, 2010, of the appeal committee of the FFC.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBoxe vs Respondent M99

27 Oct 2011

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M99 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 5, 2011, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFBoxe.
2. The results obtained on February 5, 2011, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of first instance, dated April 20, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
4. The decision dated, April 20, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe should be modified.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBoxe vs Respondent M77

7 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M77 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 19, 2011, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of furosemide. Furosemide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had taken a pharmaceutical drug on the morning of the doing test, this drug contained the prohibited substance and was taken to loose weight, he was unaware it contained a prohibited substance. There was no intention to enhance his sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFBoxe.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the decision of first instance, dated April 20, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
3. The results obtained on January 19, 2011, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The decision dated, May 26, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe should be cancelled.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBoxe vs Respondent M76

7 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M76 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 20, 2010, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFBoxe.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision, dated February 23, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
3. The decision, dated February 23, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe should be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBoxe vs Respondent M123

15 Dec 2011

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M123 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 12, 2011, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for Tuaminoheptane which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat a pathological cold, this medication contained the prohibited substance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one month in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBoxe.
2. The results obtained on February 12, 2011, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served by the decision, dated May 19, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe.
4. The decision , dated June 23, 2011, by the appeal committee of the FFBoxe should be modified.
5. The decision starts on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBoxe vs Respondent M105

10 Nov 2011

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M105 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 12, 2011, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for pseudoephedrine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat influenza, he was unaware that it contained the prohibited substance. He has a prescription for this medicine from his therapist.

Decision
1. The decision, dated August 17, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe is cancelled.
2. The respondent receives a warning.
3. The results obtained on March 12, 2011, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBB vs Respondent M34

31 Mar 2011

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M34 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. On April 10, 2010, a doping test he had to attent to was not performed.

History
The respondent arrived to late for the doping test due to some official obligations, he also didn't sign the doping control papers.

Decision
1. The decision is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (acquittal) dated September 3, 2010, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB is cancelled.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFBB vs Respondent M104

10 Nov 2011

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M104 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 13, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The decision is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served under the decision (three months period of ineligibility) dated March 30, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB.
4. The decision dated March 30, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin