Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on May 9, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of triamcinolone. This substance is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent admits an intramuscular injection with the prohibited substance without a therapeutic justification.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the UFOLEP, as decided by the disciplinary committee of the UFOLEP on July 10, 2010, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 6, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
Respondent had used medication containing prednisolone to treat nasopharyngitis. He has a certificate from his physician and a certificate of his practitioner to state his medical condition. However these statements don't explain the concentration measured.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the UFOLEP, as pronounced by the disciplinary committee of the UFOLEP on August 23, 2010, but extended to all relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Workers and Amateurs in sports (Fédération Sportive et Gymnique du Travail (FSGT)) charges respondent M58 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling contest on January 31, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication for asthmatic bronchitis, this medication was the cause for the positive test. There is medical proof for his condition. However there is no statement of his physician and the concentrations measured are to high for medical reasons. The alleged therapeutic justification can not be accepted. Also not giving the name of the medication he used shows negligence.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of nine months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time already served under the decision (3 months of ineligibility), dated May 4, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FSGT.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Workers and Amateurs in sports (Fédération Sportive et Gymnique du Travail (FSGT) charges Respondent M10 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling contest on June 1, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed a high TE ratio and a spectrometric analysis shows the origin of exogenous testosterone. Exogenous testosterone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Volley-ball (French Volleyball Federation, FFVB) charges respondent M73 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Volleyball match on May 29, 2014, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had been sanctioned by the disciplinary committee of the FFVB for two months.
Respondent had used cannabis in a difficult period or social event, but there was no intention to enhance sport performance. The respondent had stopped using cannabis and wants to help with the prevention of getting a drug addiction for youngsters in sport.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFVB.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already in served by the decision (two months period of ineligibility) of the disciplinary committee of the FFVB.
3. The decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFVB will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Volley-ball (French Volleyball Federation, FFVB) charges respondent M30 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Volleyball match on November 21, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used the prohibited substance a few days before the doping test. He didn't use it to enhance his sport performance, but used it to deal with the distress he had from separating from his wife and his right to see his daughter.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFVB.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already in served in voluntary suspension and by the decision (two months period of ineligibility), dated January 29, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFVB.
3. The decision starts on the date of the volleyball competition of 2010/2011.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Sailing Federation (Fédération Française de Voile, FFV) charges respondent M21 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a sailing event on September 9, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used the prohibited substance a week before the doping test in a recreational setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated December 1, 2009, of the disciplinary committee of the FFV should be modified.
2. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFV.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced with one month which is the period already served in by the decision, dated February 1, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFV.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Table Tennis Federation (Fédération Française de Tennis de Table, FFTT) charges respondent M31 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Code. During a match on September 19, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of triamcinolone. Triamcinolone is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substances.

History
The cause of the positive test is a medicine the respondent used against to treat occipital neuralgia. He has medicial statements to prove this condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision, dated December 18, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFTT should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Triathlon Federation (Fédération Française de Triathlon, FFTri) charges respondent M83 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a triathlon on April 18, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admits the use of cannabis, but denies wanting to enhance his sport performance. The use of the cannabis was related to personal problems he faced towards his future as professional in sport.

Decision
1. The sanction of three months ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFTri, dated August 24, 2010, as decided by the disciplinary committee of the FFTri will be extended to other relevant French sport federations.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Triathlon Federation (Fédération Française de Triathlon, FFTri) charges respondent M82 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a triathlon on April 18, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. These are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication which contained the prohibited substances to treat swollen lips and throat. He has a medical prescription for this and reports of pneumology and allergy testing.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision (six months period of ineligibility) of August 24, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFTri will be modified.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.