Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M37 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had smoked marijuana for several years. There was no intention to enhance sport performance, she used it to ease her sorrows regarding family problems.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility), dated January 27, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified. The period already served leaves a remaining time period of 30 hours
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M35 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 10, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as a specified substances.

History
The respondent had used medication containing the prohibited substances to treat a flu that was transforming in bronchitis. He has the prescription for this medication.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (a warning), dated January 6, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M28 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 24, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance the day before the doping test in a recreational setting during a birthday party. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months in which respondent can't take part in competitions or manifestations organized by the FFBB.
2. The decision (2 months period of ineligibility), dated January 27, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBB should be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served under the decision of January 27, 2010.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M01 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 1, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone. Prednisolone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent was treated with an injection in his right ankle, this injection contained the prohibited substance. He has medical statements for this treatment from his physician. There was no intention to enhance his sport performance. An application form for a therapeutic use exemption was sent to the AFLD.

Decision
1. Respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M15 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on July 5, 2009, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for atenolol. Atenolol is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent used medication to treat high blood pressure and overweight. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The decision (a warning) dated October 10, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFB should be modified.
2. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one month in which the restpondent can take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFB.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M49 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on May 9, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. They are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical to cure angina, which was the cause of the positive test. There was no consultation of a phycisian.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA.
2. All the results obtained at the event of May 9, 2010, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M25 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on September 20, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on heptaminol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical to cure the sensation of heavy legs. This pharmaceutical was the cause for the positive test.There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA.
2. The decision (1 month period of ineligibility) dated December 2, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFA should be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of December 2, 2009.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M24 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on September 27, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on prednisone and prednisolone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. They are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical product to heal an ear infection, this product was the cause of the positive test. However she failed to provided evidence of the justification for therapeutic purposes of the use of the medicine.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA.
2. The decision (a warning) dated December 2, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFA should be modified.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M23 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on September 26, 2009, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of budenoside which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
Respondent used several pharmaceutical products to treat allergies, rhinitis and asthma. These product are the cause of the positive test. He has a certificate from his physician to state his condition.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA..
2. The decision (1 month period of ineligibility) dated December 2, 2009, by the disciplinary committee of the FFA should be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of December 2, 2009.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M36 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a rally on November 29, 2009, a sample was taken for a doping test. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication to treat angina with laryngitis stridulus. He has a certificate from his physician for his prescription.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of one month in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSA.
2. The decision (acquittal) of February 23, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFSA should be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.