Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M63 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 28, 2007, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of nandrolone and a abnormally high testosterone on epitestosterone level. For the last a additional radiospectromatic analysis showed the presence of testosterone with exogenous origin. Nadrolone and exogenous testosterone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body. Also two earlier doping reports from doping control on March 8 en April 12, 2008, gave rise to the detection of prohibited substances. Which makes it an unique case to deal with two infractions at the same time.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by all French sport federations.
2. The decision by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC on June 17, 2008, should be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served under the sanction already imposed by the decision of June 17, 2008.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M20 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 28, 2007, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of canrenone, althiazide, bumetanide, metenolone and it's metabolites, clenbuterol and a metabolite of stanozolol which are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by all French sport federations.
2. The decision will apply till the end of the sanction as pronounced by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC on September 25, 2007.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M12 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on April 28, 2007, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of canrenone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent used medication to treat stomach problems, he didn't mention this on the doping control form. However this medication didn't contain the prohibited substance, which means he didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M08 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on August 31, 2006, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of indapamide which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent takes a drug containing indapamide regularly due to a medical condition. He wants to prove this by showing the medical record of his father. He had no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the decision dated May 19, 2007, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M04 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on June 29, 2007, samples were taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of furosemide and a metabolite of stanozolol. Furosemide and stanozolol are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't help in any way during the procedure.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M51 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 8, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of budesonide. Budesonide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used medication with budesonide to treat asthma. An error was made with the request for a therapeutic use exemption before the start of the season. However the amount mentioned for medical use is in accordance with the detected amount. The panel considers this case as a justified medical usage of the prohibited substance.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M48 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 24, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used cannabis together with a friend the eve before the match. He had no intention to enhance his sport performance. The amount measured was low.

Decision
1. The decision (a period of ineligibility of four months) dated March 27, 2008, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHG doesn't need to be modified.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 24, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't sign the doping control form. He at first denies the use of cannabis and blames it on unsealed water bottles he used. But later he admits the use of cannabis in a recreational setting two days before the match. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The decision will start on the date notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M44 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 1, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't produce any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The decision will start on the date notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M40 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a training on November 19, 2007, respondent didn't attend a doping test.

History
The respondent didn't attend the doping test because of his disappointment for not being selected to get a certificate as physical trainer and he was afraid of a positive test because he had used creatine to create more muscle mass.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of twenty months in which the respondent can't take place in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.