ANAD Comitet Sancțiune 2006_05 ANAD vs Elena Constantin

23 Mar 2006

In March 2006 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Elena Constantin after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance furosemide.

Therefore on 23 March 2006 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 4 March 2006.

NADA Annual Report 2005 (Germany)

16 Mar 2006

Doping-Bilanz der NADA für den Deutschen Sport 2005 / Nationale Anti Doping Agentur Deutschland (NADA). - Bonn : NADA, 2006

CPLD 2006 FFC vs Respondent M23

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M23 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on July 23, 2005, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used cannabis in a social setting, it was his first time he had used is. To prove this fact he provided an additional test which he paid, this test was negative.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which 2 months conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFA vs Respondent M22

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M22 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on October 9, 2005, respondent was asked to provide a doping sample. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of salbutamol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent mentioned the use of a pharmaceutical product which contains the prohibited substance for therapeutic reasons. However she fails to prove her condition with medical documentation.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 3 months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFTir vs Respondent M21

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Shooting Federation (Fédération Française de Tir, FFTir) charges respondent M21 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a shooting contest, on November 28, 2009, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on bisoprolol which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent did mention the use of medication containing the prohibited substance. Due to heart problems he has to use this medication and he has documentation about his heart condition. The panel considers, regarding his medical files, the use of bisoprolol medical justified for his positive test.

Decision
1. The respondents is acquitted.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFC vs Respondent M20

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M20 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on July 23, 2005, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of budesonide. Budesonide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical product containing the prohibited substance. He suffers from exercise asthma and allergies since his adolescence. He has test evidence for the findings of a methacholine, which is treated with glucorticosteroids. The panel regards the treatment justifiable for the positive test result.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFGOLF vs Respondent M19

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Golf Federation (Fédération Française de Golf, FFGOLF) charges respondent M19 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on September 4, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of methylenedioxyamphetamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine which are prohibited substances according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used ecstasy the night before the competition started, despite his lack of sleep and his nervousness at the material time, the person concerned has admitted to playing well and got a very good result in this competition, finishing in the fifth place

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year for which 6 months conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the disciplinary committee of the FFGOLF.
2. The sanction imposed by this decision for his remaining term of four months, shall take effect from the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFC vs Respondent M12

16 Mar 2006

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M10 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on July 23, 2005, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of budesonide, Budesonide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent, by a decision on October 6, 2005, had received a
sanction of 18 months period of ineligibility, six months conditionally, by the disciplinary committee of the FCC. Respondent appealed against this decision. Respondent claims not to have used any substance to enhance his sport performance, he had used products in a pharmacy against fatigue, these products where mentioned on the doping control form, they don't explain the presence of heptaminol in his sample.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year conditionally in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Screening for metabolically stable aryl-propionamide-derived selective androgen receptor modulators for doping control purposes.

15 Mar 2006

Thevis M, Kamber M, Schänzer W. Screening for metabolically stable aryl-propionamide-derived selective androgen receptor modulators for doping control purposes. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2006;20(5):870-6.

ANAD Comitet Sancțiune 2006_04 ANAD vs Diana Mihaela Tudorache

14 Mar 2006

In April 2006 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Diana Mihaela Tudorache after her A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance methandienone.
Therefore on 14 March 2006 the ANAD Sanction Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 11 February 2006.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin