AFLD 2010 FFR XIII vs Respondent M75

2 Dec 2010

Facts
The French Rugby League (Fédération Française de Rugby à XIII, FFR XIII) charges respondent M75 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. Respondent didn't provide his whereabouts data correctly as being part of the registered testing group.

History
The respondent explains that his misconduct derived from some work related problems, for that reason he wasn't engaged with his sport.

Decision
1. The sanction: a period of ineligibility of six months, as pronounced in the decision, dated July 7, 2010, by the disciplinary committee of the FFR XIII, is upheld.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of July 7, 2010.
3. The appeal of the respondent is rejected.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_21 ANAD vs Ionut Cristian Enciu

5 Dec 2011

In October 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ionut Cristian Enciu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone, fluoxymesterone and methyltestosterone.
After notification the Athlete did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission, nor did he file a statement in his defence.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_20 ANAD vs Raul Lenart

21 Nov 2011

In October 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Raul Lenart after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance oxymesterone.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substance and did not request the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_18 ANAD vs Andrei Kiss

10 Oct 2011

In October 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andrei Kiss after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
The athlete admitted he used cannabis and did not request for the B sample analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_17 ANAD vs Petru Vasile Vişovan

17 Aug 2011

In August 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Petru Vasile Vişovan after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance testosterone with a T/E ratio above the WADA threshold.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substance and did not request the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the sample collection.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_16 ANAD vs Catalin Daniel Rasinar

12 Jul 2011

In April 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Catalin Daniel Rasinar after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete admitted the use of the prohibited substance and did not request the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_14 ANAD vs Ioana Laura Banciu-Gherasim

27 May 2011

In April 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ioana Laura Banciu-Gherasim after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

After notification the Athlete a provisional suspension was ordered.
At the hearing the Athlete admitted the use of Winstroll and did not request for the B sample analysis.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_12 ANAD vs Adrian Marian Bratiloveanu

3 May 2011

In April 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Adrian Marian Bratiloveanu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.
After notification the Athlete did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission, nor did he file a statement in his defence.
Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_11 ANAD vs Silviu Budileanu

20 Apr 2011

In March 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Silviu Budileanu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not attend the hearing of the ANAD Hearing Commission. The Athlete admitted the use of cannabis and did not request the B sample analysis.
Due to this is the Athlete’s second violation the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

ANAD Comisia de Audiere 2011_10 ANAD vs Alex-Gabriel Popoviciu

5 Apr 2011

In February 2011 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Alex-Gabriel Popoviciu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).
After notification the Athlete a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the ANAD Hearing Commission.
The Athlete stated he used a food supplement Dymatize High Protein Mega Gainer, which showed it contained no prohibited substances after laboratory analysis.
The ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin