Facts
The French Mountaineering and Climbing Federation (Fédération Française de la Montagne et de l'Escalade, FFME) charges respondent M31 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a doping control at the French climbing championship May 27, 2012, a sample was taken from the respondent. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation how the prohibited substance entered his body.

Decision
1. The period of ineligibility will be 6 months, in which the respondent can't participate in competition or manifestations organized by the FFME.
2. All the results from the event on May 27, 2012 will be cancelled and all the medals, points and prizes will be redrawn.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period of voluntary suspension.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M30 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During the race "100 kilometres de Millau" the respondent was unable to produce urine for a doping test and refused a blood test.

History
Respondent explains that she wanted to change, and then to rest , given its state of fatigue and harsh climatic conditions in which the event took place.

Decision
1. The period of ineligibility is 2 years, in which the athlete can't participate in competitions and manifestations of the FFA.
2. The FFA will cancel individual results obtained by the respondent on September 29, 2012 , at the race "100 kilometres de Millau" , with all the resulting consequences including the withdrawal of medals , points and prizes.
3. The decision will start at the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M29 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During match "la finale du championnat de France professionnel du Top 14 de rugby" a sample for doping test was taken from the respondent. The sample tested positive on cathine and morphine each at a estimated concentration of 6.1 mg/ml. Cathine and morphine are prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Morphine is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used medication for pain in his left shoulder and for nasopharyngitis for which he has proof in writing from his physician. He didn't use the substances to enhance his performance in sport.

Decision
1. There is no need to start a process to sanction the respondent.
2. The decision will be publish and sent to the involved parties.

Facts
International Federation of Pétanque and Provençal Game (Fédération Française de pétanque et jeu provençal, FFPJP) charges respondent M27 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During the final of "la coupe de La Reunion de pétanque" on September 1, 2012, a sample for doping test was taken from the respondent. His sample tested positive for a metabolite of Cannabis in a concentration of 105 ng/ml. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't explain the origen of the positive result of the doping test.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 6 months, in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFPJP.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced with the time of voluntary suspension.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The earlier decision made by the disciplinary committee from the FFPJP on November 14, 2012, will be modified (3 months of ineligibility).
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
International Federation of Pétanque and Provençal Game (Fédération Française de pétanque et jeu provençal, FFPJP) charges respondent M26 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During the final of "la coupe de La Reunion de pétanque" on September 1, 2012, a sample for doping test was taken from the respondent. His sample tested positive for a metabolite of Cannabis in a concentration of 90 ng/ml. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't explain the origen of the positive result of the doping test.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of 6 months, in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFPJP.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced with the time of voluntary suspension.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The earlier decision made by the disciplinary committee from the FFPJP on November 14, 2012, will be modified (3 months of ineligibility).
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M25 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During the race track "Les cretes du Soulor", on July 29, 2012, a sample for doping test was taken from the respondent. His sample tested positive on the prohibited substances prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited substances on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent suffered since childhood from asthma and allergies and used medication for this, this medication is the cause of the positive doping test. The respondent has a declaration from her physician regarding her condition.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations of the FFA.
2. All results obtained at the match on July 29 are cancelled. Medals, points and price money are withdrawn.
3. The decision, dated October 25, 2012, of the IAA should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M24 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. A sample for doping tests was taken during the athletics event "Ultra Champsaur" on July 8, 2012. The sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone, which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent used medication for a sinusitis treatment. These medications where the cause of the positive doping tests. Prove of this was a X-ray foto and prove of the give medication.

Decisions
1. The respondent receives a reprimand.
2. All results from the athletics event "Ultra Champsaur" are cancelled. Price money, medals and points have to be returned.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges Respondent M23 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. The respondent provided a sample for doping test during a motor car contest "43e Tour auto-rallye de La Reunion", on July 28, 2012. The sample tested positive on betamethasone and hydrochlorothiazide, which are prohibited substances on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and called specified substances.

History
The respondent claims that the cause of the positive doping is the use of medication for a condition called arterial hypertension.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations related to his sport.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period allready served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In March 2011 the National Anti-Doping Agency of India (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance clenbuterol.
INADA notified the Athlete and ordered a provisional suspension.
The Athlete admitted that she had used prescription medicines as treatment for painful menstrual cycle.
Considering the circumstances the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI) decided to impose a 10 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

Hereafter WADA appealed the ADDPI decision with the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India (ADAPI).
WADA argued that an anti-doping rule violation was established; the Athlete did not obtain a TUE; the medication prescription shown to the Disciplinary Panel does not contain a prohibited substance; and the Athlete’s disease does not need to be treated with anabolic agents.

Considering the facts in this case the Appeal Panel concludes that there are no grounds for no fault or negligence. Therefore the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India decides to set aside the ADDPI decision and to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 21 March 2011.

The Athlete was involved in a motorcycle accident 29 May 2010 and suffered injuries. He underwent treatment for his injuries and soframycin was prescribed at the at the National Institute of Sports (NIS).

On 8 July 2010 the Athlete provided a sample for drug testing and hereafter the National Anti-Doping Agency of India (INADA) reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance clostebol.

The Athlete stated that after the motorcycle accident he took due care and caution to seek treatment only from the NIS Medical Centre, Patiala and not from any other private doctor. Soframycin was prescribed and the Athlete had no reason to suspect that at the Medical Centre any other substance than soframycin would be used as treatment for his injuries.

The Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI) ruled that the medical records at the Medical Centre were manipulated and holds the Athlete responsible for this. On 23 August 2011 the ADDPI decided to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

Both WADA and the Athlete appealed the ADDPI decision with the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India (ADAPI).
The Appeal Panel finds that the ADDPI decision is based on conjectures and surmises. The Appeal Panel examined the medical records at the NIS Medical Centre and concludes that these were not manipulated by the Athlete.
A mistake in the medical application of clostebol, instead of the prescribed soframycin, was made by the nurses at the NIS Medical Centre. The Appeal Panel rules that the NIS Medical Centre bears fault or negligence and not the Athlete.

Considering the exceptional circumstances in this case and with no fault or negligence the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel of India decides to annul the imposed period of ineligibility. Accordingly the ADDPI decision, dated 23 August 2010, is set aside and the WADA appeal is dismissed.