Eigen Kracht - Eigen Kracht achter de rug / Dopingautoriteit

This video is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

http://www.eigenkracht.nl/

Variatie in je training (Dutch title)

Training variety is not only a means to battle boredom, it also helps to keep your body responding to the training regime. Doing a variety of exercises and using different angles to execute them in, is key to your progression. Doing the same routine over and over is a certain way to never reach your goals. So, think 'And now for something completely diffrent', and keep working them angles.

This video is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques)

Eigen Kracht in het centrum (Dutch title).

This is the promotion video of the True Strength campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. It explains why it is important to do doping prevention in gyms. In the Netherlands more than 8% of the gym users use doping substances, mostly for cosmetic reasons. In the video 3 gym users and the gym owner explain why they choose for True Strength. Some of the materials of the campaign are also shown.

This video is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

Eigen Kracht-pot (Dutch title)

The True Strength container shows the values (ingredients) to train clean like: pride, discipline, character, selfconfidence, health and satisfaction.

This container is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

Eigen Kracht mannenposter (Dutch title)

The True Strength poster for males promotes a small container of true strength that helps you to build muscle mass and power without side effects. It can even be used by whimps (being males who want to build a physique, but are afraid to really make an effort).

This poster for males is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

Eigen Kracht vrouwenposter (Dutch title)

The True Strength poster for women (A1 format) promotes a small container of true strength that helps you to loose fat mass without side effects. It works also for jojo's (being women who got stuck in a weightgain/loss cycle).

This poster for womenr is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

Eigen Kracht z-card in display (Dutch title)

The True Strength z-card (which has the form of a small container) explaines gym visitors what the true strength campaign is all about.

This True Strength z-card is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

True to oneself? Broad and narrow ideas on authenticity in the enhancement debate / L.L. Bolt. - (Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2007) 4 (August). - p. 285-300)

Our knowledge of the human brain and the influence of pharmacological substances on human mental functioning is expanding. This creates new possibilities to enhance personality and character traits. Psychopharmacological enhancers, as well as other enhancement technologies, raise moral questions concerning the boundary between clinical therapy and enhancement, risks and safety, coercion and justice. Other moral questions include the meaning and value of identity and authenticity, the role of happiness for a good life, or the perceived threats to humanity. Identity and authenticity are central in the debate on psychopharmacological enhancers. In this paper, I first describe the concerns at issue here as extensively propounded by Carl Elliott. Next, I address David DeGrazia’s theory, which holds that there are no fundamental identity-related and authenticity-related arguments against enhancement technologies. I argue, however, that DeGrazia’s line of reasoning does not succeed in settling these concerns. His conception of identity does not seem able to account for the importance we attach to personal identity in␣cases where personal identity is changed through enhancement technology. Moreover, his conception of authenticity does not explain the reason why we find inauthentic values objectionable. A broader approach to authenticity can make sense of concerns about changes in personal identity by means of enhancement technologies.

Madison Brengle (Plaintiff)
vs
WTA Tour Inc, ITF Limited a/k/a International Tennis Federation, International Doping Test & Management AB, Stuart Miller, and John Snowball (Defendants)

Complaint

Circuit Court in and for Manatee County, Florida
Filing # 70425427 E-Filed April 9, 2018 01:40:32 PM

Madison Brengle has been a professional tennis player on the WTA Tour since 2007.

In this complaint the Athlete Madison Brengle holds the Defendants responsible for their conduct in subjecting Brengle to anti-doping blood testing using needles despite Defendants knowing and ignoring that she suffers from a rare medically-diagnosed physical condition which results in both temporary and permanent physical injury, emotional trauma, and pain and suffering from having a needle inserted into her vein, and thereafter extracting punishment and repeatedly harassing Brengle following her challenge to this conduct.

Madison Brengle contends that as a result of Defendants' bullying behavior and actions toward Brengle, which caused her to suffer professionally and personally, Brengle no longer has normal strength in her arm and endures post-trauma injuries that cause both physical and emotional damage.

Requested by the ITF Brengle underwent an independent medical assessment with the neurologist Dr. Argoff. In July 2017, Dr. Argoff examined Brengle and confirmed that she suffers from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type I. CRPS is manifested by chronic pain, which usually affects a person's arm or leg and the condition is induced by venipuncture.

In Dr. Argoff's written report, he recommended that Brengle not be subject to venipuncture and, to the extent that Brengle must undergo anti-doping testing, that tests be performed without utilization of venipuncture. Other forms of blood testing that can effectively substitute for venipuncture are, and at all relevant times have been, available.

Based upon Dr. Argoff s examination, in August 2017, ITF, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), and the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) provided Brengle with a one-year conditional exemption from venipuncture blood testing after years of Brengle's pleas and requests. Brengle, by that time, had suffered both temporary and permanent physical injuries, emotional trauma and lost earnings.

In October 2011 the United Arab Emirates National Anti-Doping Committee (UAE-NADO) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Swimmer Mohammed Abdullah Mubarak Al-Ghaferi after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine.
The Swimmer is low level educated and can’t read English, therefore he could not research the ingredients of the supplement he used. Also a team doctor was not available to consult about the use of supplements.
On 23 January 2012 the UAE-NADO Disciplinary Committee decided to impose a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Swimmer, starting on 29 November 2011.

Hereafter WADA appealed the decision of the Disciplinary Committee with the UAE-NADO Appeal Committee.
The Appeal Committee rules that the WADA appeal is allowed and to set aside the decision of the UAE-NADO Disciplinary Committee.
The UAE-NADO Appeal Committee decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Swimmer, starting on 29 November 2011.