WADA Prohibited list - Additional information in regards to the reintroduction of pseudoephedrine to the 2010 Prohibited List / WADA Prohibited List Working Committee. - World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), 2009

The WADA List Committee has reintroduced pseudoephedrine (PSE) to the 2010 Prohibited List as a specified stimulant prohibited In-Competition at a urinary threshold of 150μg/mL. This decision was based on the results of controlled excretion studies as well as scientific literature.

Given the wide availability of PSE-containing medicines, WADA recommends that the reintroduction of PSE be supported by an active information/education campaign by all stakeholders.

The trade in doping products and the challenges of supply reduction : an examinatio of Italy's experience / Letizia Paoli, Alessandro Donati. - KU Leuven, 2012. - 289 p.

Content:

- 1.) Wat is known about doping and what can this study add to it?
- 2.) Doping products and their demand
- 3.) The (illegal) suppliers of doping products
- 4.) Distribution chains and market relationships
- 5.) The role of sports bodies and organized crime
- 6.) Revenues and profits
- 7.) Anti-Doping law enforcement: legislation, actors, outcomes, and the callenges ahead
- 8.) Synthesis of findings and lessons for policy-making

Federal Law about Physical Culture and Sport in the Russian Federation / Governement of the Russian Federation. - (Russian Federal Law No. 329-FZ dated December 4, 2007)

The present Law establish legal basis, organization, economy and social basis for activities in the field of physical culture and sport in the Russian Federation. It also defines the basic principles of legislation in the field of physical culture and sport.

Anti-Doping Rules of the Russian Federation / Ministry of Sport, Tourism and Youth Policy of the Russian Federation. - (Adopted by Order No. 307 of the Ministry of Sport, Tourism and Youth Policy of the Russian Federation dated April 13 , 2011)

The Anti-Doping Rules of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”) were developed in accordance with the Federal Law No. 329-FZ dated December 4, 2007 “On Physical Culture and Sport in the Russian Federation” (Collection of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2007, No. 50, paragraph 6242; 2008, No. 30, paragraph 3616, No. 52, paragraph 6236; 2009, No. 19, paragraph 2272, No. 29, paragraph 3612, No. 48, paragraph 5726, No. 51, paragraph 6150; 2010, No. 19, paragraph 2290, No. 31, paragraph 4165, No. 49, paragraph 6417, No. 51, paragraph 6810; 2011, No. 9, paragraph 1207) (hereinafter referred to as “the Federal Law”).
Responsibility for development of the Rules and their implementation lays with the Anti-Doping Organization of the Russian Federation – Non-Profit Partnership Russian Anti-Doping Agency “RUSADA” (hereinafter referred to as “RUSADA”).

Anti-Doping Bill, 2016 / Republic of Kenya. - Nairobi, Governement of Kenya, 2016. - (Kenya Gazette Supplement No. 27A (National Assembly Bills No. 4A) ; p. 51A-85A)

THE ANTI-DOPNG BILL, 2016 A Bill for AN ACT of Parliament to provide for the implementation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Convention Against Doping in Sport; the regulation of sporting activities free from the use of prohibited substances and methods in order to protect the health of athletes; the establishment and management of the Anti-Doping Agency and to provide for the
Agency's powers, functions and management and for connected purposes.

Content:

- Establishment of the Ant-Doping Agency
- Administration and Enforcement
- Dispute Resolution
- Financial Provisions
- General Provisions
- Provisions on Delegated Powers

WADA Prohibited list - Referenced Review Of Specific Substances : Removal Of Substances Of The List / WADA Prohibited List Working Committee. - World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), 2003

In preparing the Draft Prohibited List [for 2004] the WADA List Committee has adhered to the requirements of the WADA Code.

The committee has spent considerable effort examining a number of particular issues. The conclusions of the committee following such examinations have been instrumental in permitting the recommended changes to the List for 2004.

Removal of the substances:

- Caffeine
- Phenylephrine
- Phenlypropanolamine
- Synephrine

Removed substance from the WADA Prohibited List & included in the WADA Monitoring Program

WARNING: Pseudoephedrine mentioned in this 2003 document is today still on the WADA Prohibited list after recommended reintroduction in 2009. The substance is prohibited when its concentration in urine is greater that 150 micrograms per mililiter.

Bupropion, caffeine, nicotine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, pipradrol, and synephrine: These substances are included in the WADA Monitoring Program, and are not considered Prohibited Substances.

On 10 April 2015 la Fédération Française de Football (FFF) – the French Football Federation – decided to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Respondent M62 after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis in a concentration above the WADA threshold.

Hereafter in May 2015 the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) opened disciplinary proceedings against Respondent M62. After notification the Respondent filed a statement in his defence and he was heard by the AFLD.
The Respondent admitted he had used cannabis the evening before the Doping Control without intention to enhance his performance. He acknowledged his mistake and expressed his regrets and apologies for his behavior.

Considering the circumstances in this case the AFLD decides on 5 November 2015 to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Respondent M62 less the period already served and starting on 10 April 2015.

In March 2015 la Fédération Française de Tennis (FFT) - The French Tennis Federation – has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Respondent M61 after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.

Because the FFT failed to handle the Respondent’s case within the time limit the AFLD obtained under the Rules in July 2015 automatically jurisdiction to open disciplinary proceedings against Respondent M61. After notification the Respondent did not file a statement or produce any document in his defence.
Therefore the AFLD decides on 5 November 2015 to impose a 1 year period of inegligibility starting on the date of the notification of the decision to the Respondent M61.

On December 2014 la Fédération française d'athlétisme (FFA) – the French Athletics Federation – has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Respondent M60 after his sample, provided on 15 November 2014, tested positivie for the prohibited substance testosterone.

Because the FFA failed to handle the Respondent’s case within the time limit the AFLD obtained under the Rules in August 2015 automatically jurisdiction to open disciplinary proceedings against Respondent M60.

In his defence the Respondent denied the intentional use of the substance and stated that he used several supplements the last 5 years and with a negative result after he was tested. He admitted his negligence and without intention to enhance his performance he expressed his astonishment and apologies about the violation.

Without proof of how the substance entered his body and considering the Respondent’s negligence the AFLD decides on 5 November 2015 to impose a 2 year period of inegligibility starting on the date of the notification of the decision to the Respondent M60.

On 22 June 2015 la Fédération Française de Basket-Ball (FFBB) – the French Basketball Federation – decided to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Respondent M59 after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis in an concentration above the WADA threshold. The Respondent was already sanctioned before in 2009 and 2012 for the use of cannabis.

Hereafter in September 2015 the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD) opened disciplinary proceedings against Respondent M57.
The Respondent admitted he used cannabis the day before the doping control for his chronic pain he suffered after a motorcyclye accident in October 2014. He realized his mistake and argued that he used the cannabis without intention to enhance his performance.

Considering the previous two violations the AFLD decides on 5 November to reform the FFBB decision of 22 June 2015 and to impose a 10 year period of inelgigibility on the Respondent M59 starting on the date of the provisional suspension.