UKAD 2019 UKAD vs Conner Duthie

16 Jan 2020

In May 2019 the United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the ruby player Conner Duthie after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Cannabis in a concentration above the WADA threshold. After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived his right for a hearing and accepted a provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by UKAD. The Athlete stated that he had smoked Cannabis the day before the sample collection in order to cope with his personal circumstances at the time. UKAD accepted that the violation was not intentional and considers that there were no grounds for No Significant Fault or Negligence in this case. Therefore UKAD decides on 16 January 2020 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 16 March 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

UKAD 2019 UKAD vs Gabriel Hamlin

7 Jan 2020

In March 2019 the United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Australian ruby player Gabriel Hamlin after his A and B sample tested positive for the prohibited substancd Cocaïne in a low concentration. After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived his right for a hearing and accepted the sanction proposed by UKAD. The Athlete denied the intentional use and asserted that the ingestion occurred out-of-competition in a context unrelated to sport performance. He explained that the night before the sample collection he had contact with a women and that through kissing the substance came into his system since he was unaware that she had used Cocaine that evening. The London Lab did not confirm the Athlete’s explanation but stated that the low concentration found in the Athlete’s samples was consistent with out-of-competition ingestion in the days leading up to the competition which is an earlier period of time than given in the account by the Athlete. Accordingly that UKAD did not accept the Athlete’s explanation but deems that the Athlete’s violation was not intentional, out-of-competition and unrelated to sport performance. Without grounds for No Significant Fault or Negligence UKAD decides on 7 January 2020 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of sample collection, i.e. on 8 February 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

Athletics Integrity Unit refers RusAF charges to the World Athletics Council and recommends considering expulsion of the Federation

29 Jan 2020

Athletics Integrity Unit refers RusAF charges to the World Athletics Council and recommends considering expulsion of the Federation : Press Release / Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU). - Monaco : AIU, 2019 _________________________________________________ 29 January 2020, Monaco: The Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) Board has today referred the charges issued by the AIU against the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) on 21 November 2019 to the World Athletics Council. In doing so, the AIU Board has made recommendations to the World Athletics Council to maintain the suspension of the Authorised Neutral Athlete (ANA) process until the charges are finally determined and, if the charges are upheld, to consider imposing the severest possible consequences, including considering the expulsion of RusAF from the membership of World Athletics. These recommendations were made by the AIU Board after reviewing RusAF’s response to the Notice of Charge issued on 21 November 2019 which alleged a number of breaches by RusAF of the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules relating to the involvement of RusAF officials and representatives in the submission of forged documents and false explanations to the AIU in connection with the Whereabouts Failures case of Russian athlete, Danil Lysenko. RusAF filed a Preliminary Response to the AIU's Notice of Charge on 2 January 2020 and a Supplementary Response on 16 January 2020. RusAF had a total of eight weeks in which to respond to the charges, having been granted three extensions of time by the AIU in that period. The AIU Board considers in the circumstances that RusAF has had ample opportunity to put forward any material or evidence that it contends answers the AIU's case against it. So far, in the judgment of the AIU Board, it has not done so. The AIU Board has therefore concluded that the case to answer against RusAF for multiple breaches of its obligations under the Anti-Doping Rules remains unimpaired.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

Athletics Integrity Unit charges Russian Athletics Federation with obstruction an investigation and provisional suspends several senior federation officials for tampering and complicity

21 Nov 2019

Athletics Integrity Unit charges Russian Athletics Federation with obstruction an investigation and provisional suspends several senior federation officials for tampering and complicity : Press Release / Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU). - Monaco : AIU, 2019 _________________________________________________ 21 November 2019, Monaco: The Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) has today charged the Russian Athletics Federation (RusAF) with serious breaches of the Anti-Doping Rules, including a failure to co-operate with an investigation and obstructing an investigation. The charges relate to the conduct of senior RusAF officials during an investigation into ‘whereabouts’ violations committed by Russian high-jumper, Danil Lysenko. A number of senior federation officials, including the RusAF President, Dmitry Shlyakhtin, and Executive Director, Alexander Parkin, the Athlete and his coach, have also been charged with Tampering and/or Complicity under the Anti-Doping Rules and been provisionally suspended. This follows a 15-month AIU investigation (in co-operation with RUSADA) which concluded that RusAF officials had been involved in the provision of false explanations and forged documents to the AIU in order to explain whereabouts failures by the Athlete. RusAF, suspended from the membership of World Athletics since November 2015, has been issued a notice of charge for failing to comply with its obligations as a Member Federation. RusAF has until 12 December to respond to the notice following which the AIU Board may refer the matter to the World Athletics Council to be determined in accordance with the Anti-Doping Rules.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_165 INADA vs Najeeb K.C.

6 Jan 2020

In June 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder Najeeb K.C. after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Clenbuterol, Drostanolone and Stanozolol. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete filed a statement in his defence. In his submission the Athlete denied the intentional use of the substances and stated that he had used medication for his condition. Hereafter he failed to respond to the INADA communications nor did he attend the hearing the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Panel finds that the test result showed the presence of prohibited substances in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. Without the Athlete’s response the Panel concludes that he failed to establish that the violation was not intentional nor how the prohibited substances entered his system. Therefore the Panel decides on 3 January 2020 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 7June 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_163 INADA vs Deepu D.K.

6 Jan 2020

In June 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder Deepu D.K. after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Canrenone, Drostanolone, Mephentermine, Phentermine and Stanozolol. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete filed a statement in his defence. In his submission the Athlete denied the intentional use of the substances and stated that he had used medication for his condition. Hereafter he failed to respond to the INADA communications nor did he attend the hearing the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Panel finds that the test result showed the presence of prohibited substances in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. Without the Athlete’s response the Panel concludes that he failed to establish that the violation was not intentional nor how the prohibited substances entered his system. Therefore the Panel decides on 3 January 2020 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 4 June 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_157 INADA vs Vaibhav Ganpatrao Markantewar

16 Dec 2019

In June 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder Vaibhav Ganpatrao Markantewar after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Clenbuterol, Furosemide, Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide (GHRP), Mesterolone and Stanozolol. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Athlete denied the intentional use and explained that he had used these substances on advise of his personal coach. The Panel finds that the test result showed the presence of the prohibited substances in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Panel concludes that the Athlete failed to establish that the violation was not intentional and decides therefore on 16 December 2019 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 7 June 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_154 INADA vs Naresh Kumar

3 Jan 2020

In May 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder Naresh Kumar after his sample tested positive for the prohibited Clomifene, Ibutamoren and LGD-4033. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Athlete denied the intentional use of the substances and stated that he had used supplements recommended by a friend while he was unaware they contained the prohibited substances. The Panel finds that the test result showed the presence of prohibited substances in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Panel concludes that the Athlete failed to establish that the violation was not intentional nor how the prohibited substances entered his system. Therefore the Panel decides on 3 January 2020 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 22 May 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_151 INADA vs Ravinder Kumar

3 Jan 2020

In May 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the wrestler Ravinder Kumar after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances 19-norandrosterone (Nandrolone), Buprenorphine, Heptaminol, Mephentermine and Phentermine. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete filed a statement in his defence. The Athlete in his submission only indicated that he had used medication for a treatment. Hereafter he failed to respond to the INADA communications and he didn't attend the hearing for the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Panel finds that the test result showed the presence of prohibited substances in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. Without the Athlete’s response the Panel concludes that the he failed to establish that the violation was not intentional nor how the prohibited substances entered his system. Therefore the Panel decides on 3 January 2020 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 14 May 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

ADDPI 2019_149 INADA vs Sunil Kumar

30 Dec 2019

In May 2019 the India National Anti-Doping Agency (INADA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the wrestler Sunil Kumar after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Boldenone. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel of India (ADDPI). The Athlete denied the intentional use of the substance. He had only used supplements and could not explain how the prohibited substance entered his system. The Panel finds that the Athlete could not establish that the violation was not intentional and decides accordingly that to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 29 May 2019.

show » details »
Type:
pdf
Category
  • Legal
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin