SDRCC 2009 CCES vs Valerio Moscariello

14 Dec 2009

Facts
The Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport ("CCES") alleges an anti-doping violation by Valerio Moscariello (respondent). He is Amanda Galle's conditioning coach and in regards to her positive drug test result of January 24, 2009, Ms. Galle tested positive for the presence of Nandrolone, respondent must take full responsibility. The Statement was obtained during the course of an earlier Doping Tribunal hearing involving Ms. Amanda Galle.

History
In his Statement, the respondent states that as part of Ms. Galle's conditioning regime he injected her, on a bi-weekly basis with a combination of vitamins B6 and B12 but that on January 14, 2009 he mistakenly injected her with deca-durabolin, which he had prepared for his personal use as an amateur body builder. He further states that after Ms. Galle left his residence he realized his error but did not advise her of this mistake because he thought "nationals were months away" and he did not want to "unnecessarily worry her and distract her from her training".

Decision
A twelve year period of ineligibility, commencing on the date of this decision, which is proportionate to the gravity and harm occasioned by Mr. Moscariello's conduct and appropriate in all of the circumstances.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Victoria Baranova

4 Aug 2012

The Athlete was scheduled to compete in the Women’s Sprint at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Testosterone.
After notification by the IOC the Athlete filed a statement in her defence, she left the Olympic Village and did not attend the hearing of the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete admitted she had purchased and used Testosterone to improve sports performance.

The IOC Disciplinary Commission concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and decides that the athlete Mrs Victoria Baranova, Russian Federation, Cycling Track:
1.) is excluded from the London 2012 Olympic Games;
2.) shall have her Olympic identity and accreditation card immediately cancelled and withdrawn.
3.) The Athlete’s file shall be transmitted to the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), which is requested to consider any further action within its own competence.
4.) The NOC of the Russian Federation and LOCOG shall ensure full implementation of this decision.
5.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

SDRCC 2011 CCES vs Benjamin Martel

20 Jan 2012

Facts
The Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES) charges Benjamin Martel (the athlete) for a violation of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program (CADP). On August 28, 2011, during the Quebec Road Championships held in St. Agathe, Québec, during a doping control, the Athlete provided a urine sample which resulted in an adverse analytical finding.
The analysis indicated the presence of testosterone, a prohibited substance according to the 2011 Prohibited List of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). On January 10, 2012, an arbitration hearing was held in the presence of the parties in Montreal.

History
The athlete suffered from open wounds. In order to procure him with some relief, his lesions had to be punctured. He tried all kinds of creams and household remedies but nothing worked. The probable cause of contamination was a cream but he had not enough money to pay for the analysis.

Desicion
1. The athlete did not establish exceptional circumstances and did not satisfy the criteria in order to get a reduction or elimination of the two-year ineligibility period.
2. On November 9, 2011, Mr. Martel signed an admission in compliance with Rule 7.13 of the CADP in which he declares having committed the violation assessed against him by the CCES.
When an Athlete unequivocally admits the anti-doping rule violation in writing the period of Ineligibility may start as early as the date of Sample collection. The sample of Mr. Martel was collected on August 28, 2011. On January 12, 2012, this Doping Tribunal rendered the following decision:
It is ordered that the recommended sanction by the CCES of two-year (2) ineligibility period be upheld. The suspension will be in effect from August 28, 2011 to August 28, 2013.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Soslan Tigiev (London Olympiad)

6 Nov 2012

Related case:
IOC 2016 IOC vs Soslan Tigiev (Beijing Olympiad)
October 19, 2016

The Athlete competed in the Men’s 74kg Freestyle Wrestling event at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
Previously he also competed at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamide.

The IOC Executive Board decides, as recommended by the IOC Disciplinary Commission, that the athlete Mr Soslan Tigiev, Uzbekistan, Wrestling:

1.) is disqualified from the Men’s 74kg Freestyle Wrestling event, where he had placed third;
2.) is excluded from the London 2012 Olympic Games;
3.) shall have his medal, diploma and medallist pin in the above-noted event withdrawn;
4.) The Fédération Internationale des Luttes Associées (FILA) is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence.
5.) The NOC of Uzbekistan is ordered to return to the IOC, as soon as possible, the medal, diploma and medallist pin awarded to the Athlete in relation to the above-noted event.
6.) It is noted that the Fédération Internationale des Luttes Associées considers that, in accordance with FILA rules, the third place would be reallocated to Mr Gabor Hatos, Hungary.
As a consequence, the IOC Administration is instructed to reallocate the medal, diploma and medallist pin accordingly.
7.) The NOC of Uzbekistan and LOCOG shall ensure full implementation of the Executive Board decision.
8.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

Hereafter in October 2016 the IOC Disciplinary Commission sanctioned the Athlete after reanalysis of his samples, provided at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games, tested positive fort the prohibited substance dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol).

IOC 2012 IOC vs Nicholas Delpopolo

6 Aug 2012

The Athlete competed in the men’s 73 kg Judo at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Marijuana (Cannabis). After notification by the IOC the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and waived his right to be heard before the IOC Disciplinary Commission.
The Athlete stated his positive test was caused by his inadvertent consumption to food, prior to his leaving for the London Olympic Games, that he did not realize had been baked with marijuana.

The IOC Disciplinary Commission concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and decides that the Athlete, Mr. Nicholas Delpopolo, United States of America, Judo:
1.) is disqualified from the men’s 73 kg Judo event of the 2012 London Olympic Games where he placed 7th;
2.) shall have his diploma in the above-mentioned event withdrawn; and
3.) shall have his Olympic identity and accreditation card cancelled and withdrawn immediately.
4.) The IJF is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence.
5.) The USOC is ordered to return to the IOC, as soon as possible, the diploma awarded to the Athlete in relation to the above-mentioned event.
6.) The IOC administration is requested to reallocate the diplomas to the athletes that finished behind Mr. Delpopolo in the above-mentioned event, in which Mr. Delpopolo placed 7th at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
V. This decision shall enter into force immediately.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Nadzeya Ostapchuk (London Olympiad)

12 Aug 2012

IOC 2016 IOC vs Nadzeya Ostapchuk (Beijing Olympiad)
January 10, 2017

Ms. Ndzeya Ostapchuk is a Belarussian Athlete competing in the Women’s Shot Put at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
Previously the Athlete also competed at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her A and B samples, provided on 4 August and 6 August 2012, tested positive for the prohibited substance Metenolone.
The IOC notified the Belarus Olympic Committee and a delegation attended the hearing of the IOC Disciplinary Commission.
The delegation explained that the Athlete was tested negative several times in July and August 2012 and had no explanation as to why such substance would have been found in the sample of the Athlete.

The IOC Disciplinary Commission concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation.
Hereafter the IOC Executive Board decides, as recommended by the IOC Disciplinary Commission, that the athlete Ms Nadzeya Ostapchuk, Belarus, Athletics:

1.) is disqualified from the Women’s Shot Put event, where she had placed first;
2.) is excluded from the Games of the London 2012 Olympic Games;
3.) shall have her medal, diploma and medallist pin in the above-noted event withdrawn;
4.) shall have her Olympic identity and accreditation card immediately cancelled and withdrawn.
5.) The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence.
6.) The NOC of Belarus is ordered to return to the IOC, as soon as possible, the medal, diploma and medallist pin awarded to the Athlete in relation to the above-noted event.
7.) The IOC administration is instructed to reallocate the medals, diplomas and medallist pins to the athletes that finished behind Ms Nadzeya Ostapchuk in the above-mentioned event, the first three being:
- Valerie Adams, New Zealand, first
- Evgeniia Kolodko, Russian Federation, second
- Lijiao Gong, People’s Republic of China, third
- The NOC of Belarus and LOCOG shall ensure full implementation of the Executive Board decision.
8.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

In July 2016 the IOC reported a new anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after reanalysis of the Athlete's Beijing 2008 A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (turinabol) and tamoxifen.

SDRCC 2013 CCES vs Dmitry Shulga

20 Sep 2013

Facts
The Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport charges Dmitry Shulga for a violation of the Canadian Anti-Doping Program (CADP). An urine sample was collected in competition on 16 February 2013 during SNC's Speedo Eastern Canadian Championships. His sample tested positive on metabolites of the prohibited substance bumetanide, these substances are identified as a "specified substances".

History
The Athlete was able to establish to the satisfaction of the CCES that the presence of Butanamine in his system was the result of his ingestion of the nutritional supplement Craze ("Craze"), sold by Driven Sports Inc. ("Driven Sports"). The label states "This product may contain ingredients banned by certain organizations. Shulga emailed Driven Sports: The athlete emailed the Driven Sports: "As a WADA tested athlete I am subject to drug testing and I was wondering if any banned substances are present in your pre-workout supplement Craze." On 8 August 2012 he received the following response: I can assure you that there are absolutely no controlled or prohibited substances in Craze. We fully stand by our product and have spent a lot of money researching and developing the ingredients on the label. We have been told of many users that are tested for employment including military personnel, athletes, police officers, parole officers and also parolees, who have had no issue with Craze.
Also in later contacts the Athlete was told that the product didn't contain prohibited substances.

Decision
The athlete is declared ineligible for a period of 11 months, commencing on 7 April 2013.

Costs
This Award is made without any award of costs, other than with respect to the costs and expenses incurred by each party in the arbitration, which shall be borne by each of them respectively.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Luiza Galiulina

1 Aug 2012

Related case:
CAS 2012_A_3037 WADA vs Luiza Galiulina & FIG
May 27, 2013

The Athlete was scheduled to compete at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
In July 2012 the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her pre-competition A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Furosemide.After notification by the IOC the Athlete was heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission.
The Athlete stated she did not know how the prohibited substance entered into her body. She indicated that she had taken medication for a heart condition and other products and natural herbs, to help her sleep and relax.

The Commission is not comfortably satisfied of the absence of an intent to enhance sport performance or mask the use of a performance-enhancing substance.
Therefore the IOC Disciplinary Panel concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and decides that the athlete Mrs Luiza Galiulina, Uzbekistan, Gymnastics Artistic:
1.) is excluded from the Games of the London 2012 Olympic Games;
2.) shall have her Olympic identity and accreditation card immediately cancelled and withdrawn.
3.) The Athlete’s file shall be transmitted to the Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG), which is requested to consider any further action within its own competence.
4.) The NOC of Uzbekistan and LOCOG shall ensure full implementation of this decision.
5.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Hysen Pulaku

27 Jul 2012

The Athlete was scheduled to compete at the London 2012 Olympic Games.

In July 2012 the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his pre-competition A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Stanozolol.

After notification the Athlete was heard for the IOC Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete provided a list of products he used and did not know whether of the products contained prohibited substances. The personal coach explained that neither he nor the Athlete understood how such substance ended up in the body of the Athlete.

The IOC Disciplinary Commission concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and decides that the athlete Mr Hysen Pulaku, Albania, Weightlifting:
1.) is excluded from the London 2012 Olympic Games;
2.) shall have his Olympic identity and accreditation card immediately cancelled and withdrawn.
3.) The Athlete’s file shall be transmitted to the International Weightlifting Federation, which is requested to consider any further action within its own competence.
4.) The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency shall also receive information in relation to this matter, in order to further investigate the circumstances surrounding this case within the remit of its competence, for it to follow-up accordingly.
5.) The NOC of Albania and LOCOG shall ensure full implementation of this decision.
6.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

IOC 2012 IOC vs Ghfran Almouhamad

11 Aug 2012

The Athlete competed in the Women’s 400m hurdles event at the London 2012 Olympic Games.
In August 2012 the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after her pre-competition A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance Methylhexaneamine (Dimethylpentylamine).
After notification by the IOC the Syrian Olympic Committee stated that is it was sorry and disappointed to learn that the Athlete tested positive and waved their right to attend the hearing.

The IOC Disciplinary Commission concludes that the Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation and decides that the Athlete, Ms. Ghfran Almouhamad, Syrian Arab Republic, Athletics:
1.) is disqualified from the women’s 400m hurdles event of the 2012 London Olympic Games where she placed 8th in the 2nd heat of the 1st round; and
2.) shall have her Olympic identity and accreditation card cancelled and withdrawn immediately.
3.) The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) is requested to modify the results of the above-mentioned event accordingly and to consider any further action within its own competence.
4.) The Syrian Olympic Committee shall ensure full implementation of this decision.
5.) This decision shall enter into force immediately.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin