CPLD 2008 FFB vs Respondent M41

15 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M41 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on February 18, 2006, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. Analysis of the sample highlighted the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admitted the use of cannabis in a social setting two days before the doping test in a social setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISR 2006 KNKF Decision Disciplinary Committee 2006013 T

6 Jun 2006

Facts
The Royal Netherlands Strength Sport and Fitness Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandse Krachtsport en Fitnessfederatie, KNKF) reports defendant for violation of the Anti-Doping Code (ADC) of the ISR, section 5, paragraph 2. During a out of competition doping test the defendant wasn't at home after arranging his appointment with the DCO. The report of the violation dates March 31, 2006. The defendant has a written defence dated May 1, 2006, also he attended the oral hearing June 6, 2006.

History
The defendant had forgotten an appointment for that reason he wasn't at home, due to a domestic disturbance he couldn't stay at home and stayed elsewhere and got the messages of the DCO later.
The Disciplinary Committee is qualified to handle the report.

Decision
1. The violation of de ADC, section 5, paragraph 2 has been proven.
2. The disciplinary Committee renders the following decision: a suspension of 2 years dating from the day of the decision, a fee is settled. The period will not be reduced.

Appeal
An appeal can be made within 14 days.

ITF 2006 ITF vs Mark Nielsen

5 Jun 2006

facts
Mark Nielsen was reported for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. An urine sample, taken during the Australian Open in Melbourne on January 12, 2006, tested positive for a metabolite of finasteride which is a prohibited substance. The player doesn't dispute that he committed a doping offence and doesn't request an oral hearing.

history
Since November 2003 the player took finasteride against premature baldness, he didn't know the substance was prohibited since January 1, 2005. In these circumstances he argued to bear no significant fault or negligence within the meaning of exceptional circumstances.

decision
The tribunal decides:
1. A doping offence has been established;
2. The player is automatically disqualified in respect of the Australian Open Championship 2006, and forfeits any computer ranking points and prize money obtained in that competition;
3. The period of ineligibility to be imposed is 2 years;
4. The period of ineligibility shall commence on March 10, 2006.
5. The player shall not be disqualified from any events subsequent to the Australian Open Championship 2006.

CPLD 2006 FFHB vs Respondent M40

1 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M40 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 9, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent suffered from angina and took a pharmaceutical product for treatment. She had sent the medical prescription to the council.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFHB, as pronounced by the decision, dated January 10, 2006, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHB.
2. The decision will not be published.
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFG vs Respondent M39

1 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Gymnastics Federation (Fédération Française de Gymnastique, FFG) charges respondent M39 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 26, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had consumed unknowingly cake with cannabis inside two days before the doping control. He didn't had the intention to enhance his sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from wich one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFG.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be publisched and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFTA vs Respondent M38

1 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Archery Federation (Fédération Française de Tir à l' Arc, FFTA) charges respondent M38 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on September 4, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide which are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had used medication to treat arterial hypertension (high blood pressure) which contained the prohibited substances. From his medical file the council concludes that the use of these substances are medical justifiable.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will not be published.
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFBB vs Respondent M37

1 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M37 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on December 3, 2005, a sample was taken for doping tests purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used cannabis the evening before the match in a social setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

CPLD 2006 FFHB vs Respondent M36

1 Jun 2006

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M36 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 19, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cocaine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent did not comment nor produced any new document in the open procedure before the Council. Given the seriousness of the facts, it is appropriate to extend the sanction imposed by the decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFHB, dated February 7, 2006.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFHB, as pronounced by the disciplinary committee of the FFHB but extended to all French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Leaflet Flemish Doping Hotline

1 Jun 2006

Wie sport moet weten waar de lijn ligt (Dutch title)

This leaflet promotes the website of the Flemisch Doping Authority and their Doping Hotline.

True Strength poster for women

1 Jun 2006

Eigen Kracht vrouwenposter (Dutch title)

The True Strength poster for women (A1 format) promotes a small container of true strength that helps you to loose fat mass without side effects. It works also for jojo's (being women who got stuck in a weightgain/loss cycle).

This poster for womenr is part of the True Strength (Eigen Kracht) campaign of the Dopingautoriteit. A campaign that warns gym users and bodybuilders for the health risks of doping use and offers healthy and effective alternatives (training, recovery, nutrition, nutritional supplements, mental techniques).

show » details »
Type:
jpg
Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin