Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M42 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on August 15, 2005, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
Respondent didn't provide any information about the reason for the evasion of the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a permanent ban for taking part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by approved sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Public Physical Education (Union Française des Oeuvres Laïques d'Éducation Physique, UFOLEP) charges respondent M39 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an cycling event on May 7, 2005, respondent refused to attend a doping control.

History
The respondent claims not to have been briefed for needing to attend a doping control. Despite the effort of the organizers and delegates he doensn't comply.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by sport federations.
2. The decision starts on October 10, 2005.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M38 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on May 21, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of a metabolite of salbutamol, which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent provided a certificate for the need of a pharmaceutical product to treat asthma, but he didn't provide copies of his medical files to prove his condition.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months conditionally in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Surfing Federation (Fédération Française de Surf, FFSurf) charges respondent M37 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a surf event on October 3, 2004, the respondent provided a sample for doping control purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admitted the use of cannabis. The disciplinary committee of the FFSurf ordered him to pay a fine of 5.000 American dollars.

Decision
1. The respondent is sanctioned with a period of ineligibility three months, for which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSurf.
2. The sanction starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Surfing Federation (Fédération Française de Surf, FFSurf) charges respondent M36 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a surf event on October 3, 2004, the respondent provided a sample for doping control purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis, a metabolite of methyltestosterone, Methylenedioxyamphetamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine. These substance are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent claims to have used the substances to treat back pain but has no medical evidence for this.

Decision
1. The respondent is sanctioned with a period of ineligibility two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFSurf.
2. The sanction pronounced by this decision will take effect on
January 1, 2005
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Ice Sports (Fédération Française des Sports de Glace, FFSG) charges respondent M35 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 6, 2004, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of cocaine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent acknowledges the use of cocaine during a festival week which had cause the positive test.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the (FFSG).
2. The decision will starts after October 10, 2005.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Equestrian Federation (Fédération Française d'Équitation, FFE) charges respondent M34 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
During an event on October 17, 2004, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited.

History
The respondent admitted the use of cannabis but had no intension to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFE.
2. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Swimming Federation (Fédération Française de Natation (FFN) charges respondent M40 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on June 5, 2004, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of salbutamol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had mentioned the use of medication to treat asthma on the doping control form. This medication contained the prohibited substance. However she couldn't provide evidence about the dosage she needed. Also there was no evidence from her medical file to state her condition.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFN.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Triathlon Federation (Fédération Française de Triathlon, FFTri) charges respondent M41 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 9, 2005, a sample was taken for doping tests purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent was sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of two years by the disciplinary committee of the FFTri. He didn't appear at the hearing and the contra analysis confirmed the findings. The appeal committee of the FFTri confirmed the same sanction.
The panel extends the sanction to all sport federations.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

The New Zealand Sports Drug Agency (NZSD) and the New Zealand Federation of Bodybuilders (NZFBB) have reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Respondent after his sample tested positive for the substances Stanozolol, Nandrolone and Furosemide.

The Respondent accepted that he committed an anti-doping violation. He admitted to the Tribunal that he had made a conscious decision to take the drugs and that the decision had now backfired on him. He had been advised that the drugs would assist his performance and he took them knowing of the consequences if he got caught.
The World Anti-Doping Code (WADA Code) provides for a mandatory two year suspension for a first violation involving these substances unless the athlete can show “no fault or negligence” or “no significant fault or negligence”. The Respondent accepted that these exceptions did not apply to him.

The Sports Disputes Tribunal of New Zealand decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Respondent starting on the date of this decision.
The Respondent is ineligible to participate in any capacity in a competition or activity (other than authorised anti-doping education rehabilitation programmes), authorised or organised by NZFBB or any other signatory to the WADA Code.