Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M111 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a bench press contest on February 12, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent claims she used the cannabis a few days before the doping test. She was unaware of the prohibition in sport matters using this substance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a six months period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility and canceling result obtained on February 12, 2011), dated June 28, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
3. The decision, dated June 28, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M110 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on March 1, 2011, samples were taken for doping test purposes. Respondent had tried to falsify the codes of the bloodsamples. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is regarded as a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
At the hearing the respondent had denied he tried to falsify the codes of the blood samples. But later confesses he had taken intra-muscular injections with the prohibited substance twice in 2003. He tried to enhance his sport performance to become a professional in his sport and hopes to be able to continue as an amateur.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCC as pronounced by the decision, but extended to related French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification and it will end as pronounced in the decision dated June 29, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FCC.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ice Hockey Federation (Fédération Française de Hockey sur Glace, FFHG) charges respondent M109 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 8, 2011 a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance a week before the doping test. It was used during a festivity, there was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the respondent can't take place in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHG.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision (three months period of ineligibility) dated June 22, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFHG.
3. The decision dated June 22, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFHG will be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M108 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a bench press contest on February 12, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of hydrochlorothiazide. Hydrochlorothiazide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent claims that the positive result of the doping test derives from his medication against high blood pressure. He has a prescription and a physicians certificate for this condition. He will modify his treatment.

Decision
1. The sanction is an eighteen months period of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The period of ineligibility should be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension and by the period already served by the first decision (two years period of ineligibility), dated June 28, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC.
3. The decision, dated June 28, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC should be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Shooting Federation (Fédération Française de Tir, FFTir) charges respondent M107 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a shooting contest , on February 12, 2011, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on betamethasone which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication to treat sinusitis a few days before the doping test. This medication contained the prohibited substance. He has a prescription for the medication. There was no intention to enhance his sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months.
2. The decision (warning, canceling of results and withdrawal of medals, points and prizes), dated July 25, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFTir should be modified.
3. The decision start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football Américain, FFFA) charges respondent M106 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on February 26, 2011, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis showed the presence of methylhexanamine a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used a supplement containing the prohibited substance. He was unaware of this fact because of his dyslexia and dysorthography. The panel regards this situation as negligence, an athlete stays responsible for his consumption.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M105 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 12, 2011, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for pseudoephedrine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, it is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat influenza, he was unaware that it contained the prohibited substance. He has a prescription for this medicine from his therapist.

Decision
1. The decision, dated August 17, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFBoxe is cancelled.
2. The respondent receives a warning.
3. The results obtained on March 12, 2011, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M104 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 13, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The decision is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served under the decision (three months period of ineligibility) dated March 30, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB.
4. The decision dated March 30, 2011, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M103 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an indoor athletics event on February 17, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent protests against the way his privacy is handled. And he doubts the quality of the samples.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA or related French sport federations.
2. The results obtained on February 17, 2007, are canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Concours Landais (Fédération Française de la Course Landaise, FFCL) charges Respondent M102 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a concourse on August 19 and 20, 2010, the Respondent had to undergo a doping test, which he refused.

History
The respondent didn't agree about how the doping test was conducted because he was asked to produce urine in the sight of other sportsmen.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.