Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Organization (UKAD) charged Simon Carty (respondent) for a violation of the British Bobsleigh Association's (BBA) Anti-Doping Rules (ADR). On 28 February 2012, the Respondent provided sample for doping control purposes. His sample tested positive for for the prohibited substance clenbuterol. On 8 April 2012, the Respondent requested the matter be referred to the National Anti-Doping Panel ("NADP") for hearing and determination in accordance with the ADR and NADP procedural rules.

History
The Respondent hereby admits the use of the prohibited substance clenbuterol during January and February 2012. This use occurred via the respondent's intentional consumption of a tablet-form weight loss product that he understood to be a Chinese manufactured "fat burner", whilst recovering from surgery.

The parties have proposed a resolution of the matter, subject to the approval of the NADP Tribunal.

Decision
1. Respondent admits the use of the prohibited substance clenbutorol.
2. Respondent admits the violation of the BBA ADR.
3. As a consequence, a period of Ineligibility is imposed upon the Respondent of two years.
4. During tho two year period of ineligibility: the Respondent may not participate In any capacity in any Competition, Event or other activity (other than authorized anti-doping education or rehabilitation programs) organized, convened, authorized or recognized by (a) the BBA or any body that is a member of, or affiliated to, or licensed by the BBA; (b) and Signatory; (c) any club or other body that is a member organixation; or (d) any professional league or any international or national level Event organization. In addition, save where the
Anti-Doping Rule Violation involved only a Specified Substance, some or all financial support or benefits (if any) that the BBA might have otherwise provided to the Participant shall be withheld. In addition, the BBA shall take all steps within its power to have the period of ineligibility recognized and enforced by all relevant parties, including other Signatories pursuant to Code Article 15.4; The Respondent shall remain subject to and bound to comply with the BBA ADR, including the obligation to submit to drug-testing under the rules. If requested, he will provide information as to his whereabouts to facilitate such testing.
5. There shall be no order as to the costs of these proceedings.
6. The disposition of these proceedings on the terms set out above will be publicly announced via UK Anti-Doping's website.
7. The Respondent has no further right of appeal against this order, but each of the International Bobsleigh and Tobogganing Federation (FIBT) and the World Anti-Doping Agency has a right of appeal against this Order or any part of it.

In July 2012 the UK Anti-Doping Organization (UKAD) has reported anti-doping rule violations against the rugby player  Terry Bridge for Possession and Trafficking / attempted trafficking of multiple prohibited substances:

• Boldenone;
• Clenbuterol;
• Drostanolone;
• Growth hormone (GH);
• Metandienone;
• Nandrolone;
• Oxandrolone;
• Oxymetholone;
• Stanozolol;
• Tamoxifen;
• Testosterone; and
• Trenbolone.

After notifcation the Athlete admitted the anti-doping rule violations.

Therefore UKAD decides on 26 September 2012 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on 6 February 2012.

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Organization (UKAD) charges Zbyszko Kienast (the "Athlete") for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules ("ADR"). On November 26, 2011, the Athlete competed in the BWLA London and South-East Championships. Following the completion of the competition, the Athlete was required to provide a urine sample for analysis. The analysis revealed the presence of carbon isotope ratios for testosterone, androsterone and etiocholanone that were significantly different from that of the endogenous reference steroid 11-ketoeticholanolone, and thereby revealed the presence of exogenous testosterone which is included on the prohibited list 2011. On January 2, 2012, the Athlete responded to the Notice of Charge. The Athlete stated: “I accept the charge. I do not wish to appeal.” For the avoidance of doubt, by so doing, the Athlete admitted the charge and acceded to the consequences. He also thereby accepted that he was subject to the jurisdiction of BWLA, and subject to the BWLA Anti-Doping Rules.

Decision
1. An Anti-Doping Rule Violation contrary to Article 2.1 and 2.2 has been established;
2. A period of ineligibility of two years is imposed;
3. That period of Ineligibility is deemed to have commenced as from December 22, 2011, and therefore will end at midnight on December 21, 2013.
4. The Athlete’s status during this period of Ineligibility shall be as set out in Article 10.10.

Facts
Dillian Whyte ("participant") appeals against the decision of the UK Anti-Doping Organization (UKAD) who charged him for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. The athlete provided an in-competition sample which showed the presence of methylhexaneamine (MHA). MHA is a prohibited substance listed under S6.b (specified stimulants) of the WADA 2012 prohibited list. The participant took a supplement called Jack3d which contains MHA.

Considerations panel:
It is accepted by the UKAD that the participant has shown how the prohibited substance entered his body.
A reduction for the period of ineligibility for no significant fault or negligence doesn't compute because the participant failed to take all reasonable precautions before deciding to use a nutrional supplement.

On August 28th 2012 the Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency removed Jack3d containing MHA from the UK Market.

Decision
The appeal is dismissed. The period of ineligibility imposed is 2 years from October 13, 2012.
The appellant has no further right to appeal under the rules, the decision can be challenged by the International Federation or the WADA.

Facts
The Ice Hockey UK (IHUK) charges Jerremie Domish, the "athlete" for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match On 2 March 2013 a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of cannabis and cocaine. Cannabis and cocaine are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The athlete admits the use of the prohibited substances. Because he was notified at the same time for two doping violations, it is regarded as one doping violation. It is also his first violation, this case was handled without a hearing and the standard sanction will be implied.

Decision
The sanction is a period of Ineligibility of two years starting on March 22, 2013, and will end at midnight on March 21, 2015.

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Limited (UKAD) had charged Kenneth Anderson, the athlete, for an omission of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 20, 2012, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of amphetamine, which is a prohibited substance according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

The sanction dated May 16, 2013, was a period of ineligibility of two years from 9 November 2012, the date with effect from which the Athlete was provisionally suspended. The Athlete's results from the bout on 20 October 2012 are disqualified. The prize money of £15,000 must be repaid to the British Boxing Board of Control.

History
The athlete couldn't appear at the hearing because of hospitalization. His representative explained the appeal was made on two grounds: The first was that it was reasonably anticipated that fresh evidence could be available. The second was that the tribunal had misdirected itself as to the standard of proof and approached the Appellant's evidence with excessive caution. The notice asked for further time to obtain the fresh evidence.
However no new evidence was provided.

Decision
The appeal is dismissed, the sanction of the former decision remains.

Facts
The Rugby Football Union ("RFU") charged Aaron Mason (the "player") for an omission of the Anti-Doping Rules. The player was selected for a doping test on 15 April 2013. His sample showed the presence of methandienone (commonly known as Dianabol). The player admitted the doping offence.

History
The player didn't supply information about how the prohibited substance entered his body.

Decision
A period of ineligibility of two years was imposed.

Appeal
An appeal can be made within the regulations of RFU.

In April 2012 the Cumbria Police seized several prohibited substances in the house of the Athlete Andrew Quarry. After his arrest he was interviewed, later charged and pleaded guilty.
In July 2013 the Athlete was convicted and sentenced upon indictment of “Conspire to supply controlled drug of Class C Anabolic Steroids”:

• testosterone (various types);
• stanozolol (Winstrol);
• human growth hormone;
• clenbuterol;
• oxandrolone (Anavar);
• trenbolone (Parabolin);
• metenolone (Primobolan);
• boldenone, nandrolone;
• clomifene (Clomid); and
• metandienone (Dianabol)".

In June 2013 the Rugby Football Union (RFU) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete for trafficking, attempted trafficking and possession of a prohibited substance or a prohibited method.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. Because the Rugby Football Union (RFU) was unable to establish whether or not the Athlete had received the relevant papers the proceedings were suspended in December 2013.

The proceedings of the RFU Disciplinary Panel against the Athlete were obstructed for months due to the police provided limited evidence about the criminal proceedings against the Athlete. In February 2016 the Athlete was notified again of the resumed disciplinary proceedings.

Considering the evidence the Panel finds that the Athlete committed three separate anti-doping rule violations for several prohibited substances in in large scale operation involving the supply (traffic) on a commercial basis of prohibited substances.

Therefore on 28 March 2016 the RFU Disciplinary Panel decides to impose a 12 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 21 June 2013.

Facts
The Rugby Football Union (RFU) charged Harrison Pickett (the Athlete) for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. On October 3, 2013, the athlete was selected for a doping test. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of oxymetholone. Oxymetholone is a prohibited substance according the regulations of the Internation Rugby Board (IRB).

History
One day after the doping test the athlete informed the Director of Elite Sport at Hartpury College, Phil De Glanville, that he had been taking winstrol to treat an injury. This substance is the cause of the positive test. This information was forwarded to the UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) and the RFU and is seen as a prompt admission.

Decision
The Panel has imposed a two year period of ineligibility on the athlete commencing on 9 October 2013. The period expires at midnight on 8 October 2015.

Facts
The Rugby Football Union ("RFU") charged Jack Warrington (the "Player”) for an omission of the Anti-Doping Rules. On 10 November 2012, provided a urine sample for a doping control test. The sample returned an adverse analytical finding which highlighted the presence of Methylhexaneamine (“MHA”) which is classified as a prohibited substance.

History
The player used several supplements, some were indicated not being the source of the contamination, others couldn't be tested. The Player made no further representations as to the inhaler he bought on holiday in Portugal being the source of the MHA.

Decision
The sanction imposed for this anti-doping rule violation is a period of ineligibility of two years for the Player commencing 23rd November 2012 (the date upon which the Player was notified of the adverse analytical finding and provisionally suspended) and concluding on (but inclusive of) 23rd November 2014. In the meantime, the Player’s status is that governed by IRB Regulation.