In October 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Andrei Mihai Ilca after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance oxymetholone.

After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not request the B sample analysis.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 24 November 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In October 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Tibi Dioszegi after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

The ANAD Hearing Commission considers that the Athlete committed a second anti-doping rule violation and that he failed to attend the hearing of the Commission.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 24 November 2009 to impose a lifetime period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In October 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Lucian Boerescu after he refused to provide a sample for drug testing.

After notification the Athlete failed to attend the hearing of the Commission.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 24 November 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

Related case:
ANAD Comisia de Apel 2010_04 Angela Raluca Rӑducu vs ANAD
April 8, 2010

In September 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Angelica Raluca Rӑducu after her A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance stanozolol.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 24 November 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In October 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Ionuț Miclea after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance metandienone.

After notification the Athlete filed a statement and a medical file in his defence. The ANAD TUE Commission considered the Athlete’s medical file and concluded that the his medical treatment showed no ground for the administration of the prohibited substance.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 10 November 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In September 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Peter Laszlo Bartha after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances clenbuterol and stanozolol.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 10 November 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In September 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Claudiu George Neșcu after he refused to provide a sample for drug testing.

Therefore the ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 14 October 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In September 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Daniel Irimia after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance 19-norandrosterone (nandrolone).

After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and did not request the B sample analysis.

The ANAD Hearing Commission decides on 14 October 2009 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

Related case:
ANAD Comitet Sancțiune 2007_15 ANAD vs Mihai Gabriel Feroiu
October 17, 2007

In September 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Mihai Gabriel Feroiu after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance mesterolone.

The ANAD Hearing Commission considers that the Athlete committed a second anti-doping rule violation and that he failed to attend the hearing of the Commission.

Therefore on 23 September 2009 the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a lifetime period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.

In June 2009 the Agenţia Naţională Anti-Doping (ANAD), the National Anti-Doping Agency of Romania, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Cornel Bobancu Alicescu after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance trenbolone.

Therefore on 17 September 2009 the ANAD Hearing Commission decides to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the decision.