AFLD 2011 FFB vs Respondent M57

16 Jun 2011

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M57 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a three cushions billiards tournament on June 11, 2010, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for hydrochlorothiazide which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used medication to treat high blood pressure. He has a medical certificate. Regarding his age there was no reason for him to use doping.

Decision
1. The decision (a warning) dated November 6, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFB will not be modified.
2. All results obtained at the match of June 11, 2010, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes will be withdrawn.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M83

15 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M83 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cross-country on December 11, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on norpseudoephedrine a metabolite of pseudoephedrine, a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used medication to treat influenza and sinusitis symptoms as an emergency. There was no intension to enhance his sport performance.

Decision.
1. The sanction is warning.
2. The results obtained at the cross-country of December 11, 2010, are canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision, dated April 1, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFA is cancelled.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M71

7 Jul 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M71 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a marathon on October 17, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on nikethamide and it's metabolite. Nikethamide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used a pharmaceutical to prevent a hypoglycemia condition, he hadn't checked the ingredients. There was no intension to enhance his sport performance.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The results obtained at the marathon of October 17, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M67

7 Jul 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M67 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a marathon on October 17, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent doensn't deny the use of cannabis and accepts the penalty if it is a period of ineligibility.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The results obtained at the marathon of October 17, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M21

24 Feb 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M21 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on July 25, 2010, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medications to treat pain in the joints and chronic back pain, these medication where the cause of the positive test. However he already had a previous sanction (3 years period of ineligibility), dated July 17, 2007, by the disciplinary committee of the FFA for using nandrolone, stanozolol and strychnine.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA and related French sport federations.
2. All results obtained in the athletics event of July 25, 2012, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M15

17 Feb 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M15 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on September 25, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisone and prednisolone. Prednisone and prednisolone are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list, they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent used medication against angina which caused the positive test.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. All the results obtained on September 25, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M103

17 Oct 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M103 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an indoor athletics event on February 17, 2007, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent protests against the way his privacy is handled. And he doubts the quality of the samples.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or sport manifestations organized by the FFA or related French sport federations.
2. The results obtained on February 17, 2007, are canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFA vs Respondent M02

6 Jan 2011

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M02 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.

History
The respondent didn't provide his whereabouts data as part of the designated testing group on July 9, 2009, October 17, 2009 and May 11, 2010. He did receive three warnings regarding his duties. The respondent didn't gave any explanation about the reason for not delivering the data.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FCSAD vs Respondent M90

29 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Federation of Sport Clubs and Art of Defence (Fédération des Clubs Sportifs et Artistiques de la Défense, FCSAD) charges respondent M90 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a country-cross on December 12, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis showed the presence of clenbuterol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had not been able to explain how the prohibited substance had entered her body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCSAD, as pronounced on May 2, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FCSAD but extended to related French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2011 FFSA vs respondent M88

29 Sep 2011

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M88 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Motor Sports event on October 23, 2010, a sample was taken for a doping test. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had willingly taken cocaine mixed in a glass of whiskey during a festivity a few days before the doping test. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction will be a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time all-ready served in voluntary suspension and the time served by the first instance decision of February 8, 2011, by the disciplinary committee of the FFSA.
3. The decision (acquittal) of the disciplinary committee of the FFSA, dated March 24, 2011, should be modified.
4. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published en sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin