WADA has produced a series 15-second video clips to help drive its ‘Say NO! To Doping’ awareness campaign.

The clips, designed to reinforce the sporting concept of fair play and integrity, are also available to stakeholders to utilize for their own awareness initiatives.

WADA hopes that the clips will be used as widely as possible to deliver the message that success in the sporting arena can only be achieved through hard work, dedication, respect for your fellow competitors, and respect for the rules of sport.

Facts
The UK Anti-Doping Organization (UKAD) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Belgian cyclist Marcel Six for his refusal to submit to sample collection in May 2012.

History
The Athlete admitted the violation and argued that his refusal was justified. He explained with evidence that due to the medical condition of his wife and kids he was unwillingly to comply, as his presence was urgently required. A statement of his wife was provided in support of the Athlete's explanation.

Decision
The Panel accepts that there was a compelling justification in this case and that the Athlete established No Significant Fault or Negligence.
1. The period of ineligibility will be 18 months from the date this decision is made.
2.The in-competition results on May 31, 2012, will be disqualified.

Costs
Each party shall bear it's own costs.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M92 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on June 23, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on prednisolone and a high level of testerone above epitestosterone. A complementary spectrometric analysis showed an exogen origin of metabolites of testosterone. Prednisolene and testosterone of exogen origin are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substances had entered his body.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already fulfilled in voluntary suspension.
3. All the results obtained at the event on June 23, 2012, will be cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M90 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a ski event on March 31, 2012, de respondent underwent a doping test. His sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cananis in a recreational setting, there was not intention to enhance sport performances.

Decision
1. The sanction is a six months period of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFS.
2. The decision (warning and fine of 500 euros) dated June 8, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS will be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Ski Federation (Fédération Française de Ski, FFS) charges respondent M90 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During ski event on February 25, 2012, de respondent underwent a doping test. His sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent admitted in writing the use of cannabis. The decision dated May 23, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS was a warning and a fine of 500 euros. Respondent wants to be acquitted of the fine.

Decision
1. The sanction is a four months period of ineligibility in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFS.
2. The decision dated May 23, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFS will be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme,FFA) charges respondent M89 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a semi-marathon event on May 20, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on erythropoietin (EPO). Erythropoietin (EPO) is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent claims that the sampler collector made an error or one of her competitors had committed a malicious act. The respondent sent copies of her medical dossier. Regarding her age and hurt knees there was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision.
1. The sancion is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA or other relevant federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification and will last till the end of the sanction dated July 11, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFA.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M88 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a billiard tournament on January 14, 2012, a sample for a doping test was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cannabis during a celebration, the eve before the doping control. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFB.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision dated April 17, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFB.
4. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility) dated April 17, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFB will be modified.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme,FFA) charges respondent M87 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cross-country event on January 29, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive on prednisolone and prednisone. Prednisolone and prednisone are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and they are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent proves that the cause of the positive test is the use of a medicine against astma. The amount measured is consistent with the medical use of this substance.

Decision.
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision of May 3, 2012, made by the disciplinary committee of the FFA is cancelled.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M86 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a weightlifting event on January 25, 2012, the respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation for not attending the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M85 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a handball match on January 27, 2012, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of morphine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Morphine is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used a medicine containing codeine which is able to metabolize into morphine. The medication was used to ease back pain as a result of a horse riding accident.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision (period of ineligibility 4 months) dated January 9, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFHB will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.