Annual report 2014 Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) / Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA). - Moscow : Российское антидопинговое агентство (РУСАДА), 2015

Contents

Annual report 2014 of Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) 4
1. RUSADA main challenges in 2014 4
2. RUSADA participation in doping-control during Sochi Olympic
and Paralympic Winter Games 4
3. Doping-control 5
3.1. Planning, collection and transporting of the samples 5
3.2. Educational programs 12
3.3. Results Management 17
3.4. Therapeutic use exemptions (TUE) 20
3.5. Athlete’s biological passport 22
3.6. Investigations 22
4. International cooperation 22
5. Priority objectives for 2015 24
Annex 1 26
Annex 2 30

Annual report 2013 of the Russian anti-doping agency RUSADA / Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA). - Moscow : RUSADA, 2014

Contents
Collection and Transportation of Samples 1
Distribution of samples by regions and cities of Russia in 2013
(first ten regions) 2
Distribution of collected samples by sports in 2013 (first ten sports) 2
Distribution of samples by the type of testing and comparison with the previous years 3
Holding educational events for athletes and athlete support personnel 7
Holding educational events in the run-up to the Universiade in Kazan 13
Processing of the results and investigations 14
Comparison of anti-doping rule violations and abnormal results of the analysis data 14
Comparison of anti-doping rule violations by year 15
Five federations with the highest number of violations 15
Federation with significant increase of anti-doping rule violations as compared with 2012 16
Federation with significant decrease of anti-doping rule violations as compared with 2012 16
Therapeutic use 18
Requests for the therapeutic use by prohibited substances 19
Athlete Biological Passport 20
International cooperation 21

RUSADA Annual Report 2012 / Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA). - Moscow : RUSADA, 2013

Contents
Collection and Transportation of Samples 1
Distribution of samples by regions and of Russia for 2012 (first ten regions) 1
Distribution of collected samples by sports for 2012 (first ten
sports) 2
Distribution of samples by the type of testing and comparison with the indicators of
2011 3
Distribution of samples by the age of athletes for 2012 3
Holding educational events for athletes and athlete support personnel 5
Seminars participants 7
Development of strategies and new programs 8
Preparation for the XXII Winter Olympic Games 2014 in Sochi 9
Preparations for the Universiade in Kazan in 2013 10
Processing of results and investigations 11
Classes of the identified substances 12
Number of anti-doping rules violations 12
Work on the Athlete Biological Passport program 13
Therapeutic use 13
Requests for therapeutic use 13
International cooperation 14

RUSADA Annual Report 2011 / Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA). - Moscow : RUSADA, 2012

Contents
1. Introduction. Message from the Director General 3
2. Report on RUSADA activities in 2011 5
2.1. RUSADA priorities and goals in 2011 5
2.2. ISO 9001 certification 5
2.3. Structure and work organization 6
2.4. Doping-controls 7
2.4.1. Sample collection and transportation 7
2.4.2. Athlete’s Biological Passport 8
2.4.4. Therapeutic Use Exemption 12
2.4.5. Education and PR 13
2.4.6. Information and Education 13
2.4.7. XXX Summer Olympic Games 2012 in London 14
2.4.8. XXII Winter Olympic Games 2014 in Sochi 15
2.4.9. Communications 16
2.5. Regional Cooperation 17
2.6. International Cooperation 18
RUSADA Contact Details 32
Appendix 1. Doping-controls
Appendix 2. Results Management
Appendix 3. TUE Committee

Facts
Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) alleged Finn Hart-Strawbridge, the athlete, for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. The proceedings are based on the Athlete having ordered a prohibited substance “GHRP-6” over the internet in September 2014.

History
The athlete admitted the violation. He claims to have ordered it as a joke, customs had intercepted the package.
The panel concludes that the athlete had put himself at risk with his action; he acted naive about the outcome.

Decision
- The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, from and including 23 September 2014.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M39 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on November 8, 2014, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of morphine which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2014 prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used medication containing codethyline which metabolizes into morphine. He had used it to treat a soar throat. He has a copy of the invoice which mentions the medication in the form of a syrup. He did not had the intention to enhance his sport performance.
The panel agrees that the measured concentration is in accordance with the medical use.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M38 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
Respondent provided a sample for doping control purposes on December 21, 2014, during a test run. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of tuaminoheptane which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2015 prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance. She has a prescription for the medicine.

History
The respondent had been sanctioned by the disciplinary committee of the FFA with a period of ineligibility of 9 months in which respondent could not take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA. Results obtained on December 21, 2014, were cancelled. Medals, point and prizes were withdrawn.
The respondent had used medication against nasopharyngitis from which she suffered for several weeks and wanted to avoid contamination to her family, including her eleven months of age child. She had been negligent to tell her physician that she was doing sport in competition.

Decision
1. The respondent is sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of nine monts, in which she can not take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA and related French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the time already fulfilled by the sanction of the disciplinary committee of the FFA.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation for Kick Boxing, Muay Thai and Associated Disciplines (Fédération française de Kick Boxing, Muay Thaï et Disciplines Associées, FFKMDA) charges respondent M37 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Muay Thai and Pankration event on December 6, 2014, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2014 prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had been sanctioned by the disciplinary committee of the FFKMDA with a period of ineligibility lasting six months. His obtained results on December 6, 2014, were cancelled. Medals, points and prizes were withdrawn.
The respondent had used cannabis the evening before the doping test in a social setting, there was no intention to enhance sport performance.
The panel regards the use of cannabis as a danger for the respondent and his environment.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of 9 months of ineligibility in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFKMDA and related French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served in provisional suspension and by the period from the decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFKMDA.
3. The decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFKMDA will be modified.
4. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M36 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a billiard tournament on November 23, 2014, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis and a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine and cannabis are prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The disciplinary committee had sanctioned the respondent with a period of ineligibility lasting one year in which he can not take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFB. His results obtained on November 23, 2014, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
The respondent uses cannabis 4 or 5 times a day, he had used cocaine during the two weeks before the doping control. He had used it because of personal problems. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.
The panel took in consideration that respondent voluntarily admitted having consumed cocaine and cannabis, substances classified as narcotics; furthermore, he did not comment, nor produced any documents during the procedure opened against him before the French Anti-Doping Agency (AFLD). His high level of competing and the number and nature of the prohibited substances it is necessary to impose a sanction.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFB and related French sport federations.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFB.
3. The decision of the disciplinary committee of the FFB will be modified.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M35 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
Respondent provided a sample for doping control purposes on February 22, 2015, during a test run. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of heptaminol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) 2015 prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used medication containing the prohibited substance. He had mentioned this on the doping control form. The medication was used for venous insufficiency of the lower limbs. He has a medical statement of is physician and adds he is not an elite-athlete.
The panel is not satisfied with the medical statement of his physician, this statement was related to an earlier period. The panel regards the use as self medication which can be a dangerous act. The respondent had failed in his responsibility to check the ingredients of his medication.

Decision
1. The respondent is sanctioned with a period of ineligibility of one year, in which he can not take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA and related French sport federations.
2. All results obtained on February 22, 2015, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision starts on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.