Facts
The French Kanoe and Kayak Federation Federation (Française de Canoë-Kayak, FFCK) charges respondent M23 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Kanoe-Kayak event on October 30, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admitted in writing and at the hearing that he had used cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months, from which 5 months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFCK.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will not be published
4. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M22 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 15, 2004, a sample was taken for doping tests purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits the use of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 3 months, for which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of American Football (Fédération Française de Football Américain, FFFA) charges respondent M21 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on August 25, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping control. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits the use of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 18 months, from which 16 months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M20 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a rally on June 13, 2004, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent wasn't asked to attend the doping control. He claims his signature on the doping control form wasn't his, and the signature has great similarities with the signature on other documents. By the time he should have attended the control respondent was dealing with car problems.
The panel concludes there was some wrong doing in the doping control procedure.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will not be published.
5. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Boxing Federation (Fédération Française de Boxe, FFBoxe) - charges respondent M19 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 22, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent didn't provide any information for the legitimate use of the prohibited substance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months, for which 3 months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBoxe.
2. The sanction imposed will start on the date of the notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M18 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on July 29, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of terbutaline which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent claims that the positive result derived from the use of a pharmaceutical product to treat asthma. He has a medical certificate to prove his medical state, also his medical file confirms this. The panel regards this case as medical justifiable.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will not be published.
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M17 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on November 27, 2004, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent was summoned to attend the doping control but he refused. He has failed to submit written comments on the board and appear before it; the explanations provided in a letter to the president of the federation are not such as to mitigate the seriousness of the facts.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 18 months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision starts after March 21, 2005.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M18 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 9, 2004, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the samples showed the presence of triamcinolone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent claims that the positive result derived from an ointment, containing glucocorticosteroids, he had used. The panel accepted this explanation and regarded this treatment as medical justifiable.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will not be published.
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M15 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletics event on September 26, 2004, respondent was asked to provide a doping sample. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of betamethasone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had an injection with an unknown substance one week before the doping control. This injection is the probable cause of the positive test. He has no justification for the use of it.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In November 2012 the International Swimming Federation (FINA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Swimmer Johndry Segovia Ramos after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).

After a delay in the proceedings the FINA Doping Panel decides on 10 October 2014 to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Swimmer, back-dated starting on 3 November 2012 until on 3 May 2013.

All competitive results achieved by the Swimmer on or after 3 November 2012 and through and including the date of 3 May 2013 shall be annulled together with the consequences thereof (forfeiture of medals/prizes, reimbursement of prize-money).