Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M01 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on May 15, 2004, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of heptaminol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had checked if the ingredients of a product he used were on the prohibited list. At that time heptaminol wasn't mentioned on the annexed list of April 20, 2004.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be not be published
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French National Police Sport Federation (Fédération Sportive de la Police Nationale, FSPN) charges respondent M76 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event, on October 22, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admitted the use of the prohibited substances because of self-medication to heal.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year from with six months conditionally in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FSPN and other French sport federations.
2. The sanction imposed by the present decision shall take effect from the date of notification. It will apply until the end of the execution of the penalty inflicted on September 18, 2006, by the Disciplinary Committee, given the temporary suspension of the sanction since October 26, 2006, the date of referral of the Agency.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M75 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 11, 2006, a sample was taken for doping tests purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits by e-mail the use of cannabis but there was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Free Flight Federation (Fédération Française de Vol Libre, FFVL) charges respondent M73 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During competition on May 27, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
Respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered the body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFVL.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Free Flight Federation (Fédération Française de Vol Libre, FFVL) charges respondent M73 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During competition on May 27, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. It is regarded as a specified substance.

History
Respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered the body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFVL.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M72 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on March 19, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of salbutamol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had received a warning from the disciplinary committee of the FFHMFAC. He had mentioned the use of medication containing salbutamol to treat asthma on the doping control form. Due to respitary problems since his adolescence he has therapeutic treatment. He has medical prescriptions and an examination to prove his condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be not be published
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Taekwondo Federation (Fédération Française de Taekwondo, FFT) charges respondent M71 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 8, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolie of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent accepted the test results. He didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFT.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M70 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. Respondent had been sentenced for the possessing of cocaine by the High Court of Castres.

History
The respondent had been the subject of a criminal prosecution for unauthorized acquisition and illicit use of narcotic drugs, cocaine. He was sentenced for these facts to four months imprisonment.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two year in which he can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M69 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 20, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used cannabis during a festivity because of his depressed mood after returning from vacation. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one month in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Triathlon Federation (Fédération Française de Triathlon, FFTri) charges respondent M68 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on June 25, 2006, a sample was taken for doping tests purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of salbutamol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent explained that he had used an inhaler to treat asthma. Is medical file confirms his condition. However a Swiss authorization for the use of this medication didn't indicate the amount needed.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFTri.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.