Facts
The French Motor Sports Federation (Fédération Française du Sport Automobile, FFSA) charges respondent M11 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a rally on May 8, 2006, a sample was taken for a doping test. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of budesonide which is a prohibited substance according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent hadn't mentioned the use of medication containing budesonide on the doping control form. However she has her medical record which shows she is using this medication since childhood for a medical condition she suffers from, this justifies the use of the medication.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M10 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on August 9, 2005, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of stanozolol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't deny the allegation, he also didn't send in written submissions and didn't attend the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In November 2013 the International Swimming Federation (FINA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Swimmer Sergey Makov after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance ostarine; a Selective Androgen Receptor Mudulator (SARM).
After notification FINA ordered a provisional suspension and the Swimmer filed a statement in his defence.

The Swimmer submitted that his wasn’t able to attend the hearing of the FINA Doping Panel and contested the reliability of the testing procedure.
The Panel concludes that the Swimmer failed in his motions, arguments and contentions to prove any of the grounds for reduction of sentence as set in the FINA rules.
Therefore the FINA Doping Panel decides on 8 September 2014 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Swimmer, starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. 12 October 2013.

In January 2014 the International Swimming Federation (FINA) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Swimmer Ivan Alejandro Enderica Ochoa after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance clenbuterol.
After notification FINA ordered a provisional suspension. The Swimmer filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the FINA Doping Panel.

The Athlete admitted the violation and stated that due to a respiratory infliction he used medications, prescribed by the sports federation’s physician, 10 days and 3 days before the doping control.
The physician testified and sustained the Athlete’s statement.

The FINA Doping Panel accepts that the Swimmer has no intention to enhance his sports performance, but also was naïve and insufficienty cautioned by his physician and failed to investigate the label of the medication before using. The Panel also considers that the physician made a big mistake due to he prescribed a medication that contained a prohibited substance.
Therefore the FINA Doping Panel decides on 18 June 2014 to impose a 12 month period of ineligibility on the Swimmer, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 7 March 2014.

Facts
The French Federation of Bullfighting (Federation Française de course camarguaise, FFCC) charges respondent M09 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an event on August 1, 2005, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent refused to summit the doping control because he doesn't want to be involved with the federation.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months, from which 2 months conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFCC.
2. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Powerboat Racing (Fédération Française de Motonautique, FFM) charges Respondent M08 with a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an event on September 11, 2005, the respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis which is a prohibited substance on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent does not dispute the results of the analysis, he failed to submit written observations to the Council and to appear before the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months from which one month conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFM.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M07 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on September 10, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis which is a prohibited substances according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent does not dispute the results of the analyses conducted, he has failed to submit written observations to the Council and to appear before the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months for which one month conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M06 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an athletic event on June 25, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of ephedrine which is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
Respondent had no intention to enhance sport performance and was surprised by the findings.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months for which three months conditionally, respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M05 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on January 16, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of 19-norandrosterone, epimethendiol (17α-methyl-5β-androstane-3α,17β-diol), two metabolites of metandienone (6β-hydroxymethandienone, 17-epimethandienone) and testosterone or its precursors which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admits the use of the steroids to enhance his sport performances, but appealed against the decision of the disciplinary committee for a reduction of the sanction because it was his first violation.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

In October 2013 the Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission (JADCO) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Kenneth Edwards after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substance hydrochlorothiazide.

The Athlete did not challenge the violation and stated that he suffered from a serious sprain in his hand which was treated with prescribed antibiotics and anti-inflammatory medication.
In support an expert showed that the Athlete’s prescription could be contaminated at the pharmacy or in the manufacturing process.

The Panel concludes that the Athlete had no intention to enhance his sport performance and that the concentration of the prohibited substance in the Athlete’s sample was very low. Therefore the Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission Disciplinary Panel decides on 5 May 2014 to impose a reprimand on the Athlete without a period of ineligibility.