AFLD 2012 FFBB vs Respondent M100

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Basketball Federation (Fédération Française de Basket-Ball, FFBB) charges respondent M100 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 21, 2012, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of furosemide. Furosemide is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent did use medication with the prohibited substance, but was unaware that it had contained the prohibited substance. However she couldn't provide any document as proof for using it for medical reasons.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFBB.
2. The decision dated July 11, 2012, from the disciplinary committee of the FFBB will be modified.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFC vs Respondent M99

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M99 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 26, 2012, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on the prohibited substance triamcinolone. Triamcinolone is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent took medicine to treat a chronicle cold in the nose, he has a certificate from his physician to state this condition.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M98

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squash Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M98 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on April 28, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cannabis in a recreational setting in the days before the doping control. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 29, 2012, by the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash.
3. The decision dated June 29, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFR vs Respondent M97

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M97 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 18, 2012, a sample was taken for a doping test. The sample tested positive on terbutaline which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Terbutaline is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent explains that the positive test is caused by medications he used to treat asthma. He has proof of negligence by the French Anti-Doping Agency for not receiving a Therapeutic Use Exemption (Tue).

Decision
1. The respondent receives a warning.
2. The decision of March 8, 2012, from the disciplinary committee of the FFR is cancelled.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFA vs Respondent M96

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Athletics Federation (Fédération Française d'Athlétisme, FFA) charges respondent M96 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a semi-marathon event on May 20, 2012, a sample for doping test purposes was taken. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of tuaminoheptane. Tuaminoheptane is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and considered as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the remains of medication for her child, a spray that contained the prohibited substance. The respondent did know it contained the prohibited substance.

Decision.
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFA.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by three months which was the period already served in voluntary suspension.
3. The decision (3 months period of ineligibility) dated May 31, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFA will be modified.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

ISI 2010_4 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs X

14 Jul 2010

In June 2010 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the minor Player after her sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis.
After notification the Player was heard for the ISI Tribunal. The Player admitted she used cannabis out of competition.
Without intention to enhance her sport performance the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player.

ISI 2011_4 ISI Anti-Doping Committee vs Hrannari Guðmundsson

25 Aug 2011

In June 2011 Lyfjaráð ÍSÍ, the Iceland ISI Anti-Doping Committee, has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete Hrannari Guðmundsson after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance cannabis. After notification the Athlete was heard for the ISI Tribunal.
The Athlete admitted he used cannabis out of competition, which was confirmed by the levels of the prohibited substance found in the doping test.
Without intention to enhance his sport performance the ISI Tribunal decides to impose a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Player, starting on the date of the notification, i.e. on 23 June 2011.

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M95

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M95 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent didn't provide any explanation about how the prohibited substance had entered his body.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision (1 year and six months period of ineligibility) dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M94

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M94 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for cathine. Cathine is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cathine is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used a medicine against a cold on advise of his physician. This medicine was the cause of the positive test result because it contained pseudoephedrine which metabolizes into
cathine.

1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

AFLD 2012 FFSquash vs Respondent M93

8 Nov 2012

Facts
The French Squach Federation (Fédération Française de Squash, FFSquash) charges respondent M93 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a squash tournament on February 11, 2012, a sample for a doping test purposes was taken. The sample tested positive for a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the Word Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list. Cannabis is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the cannabis during in a recreational setting in the weekend before the doping control. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1 The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized by the FFSquash.
2. The decision (1 year and 6 months period of ineligibility) dated June 27, 2012, of the disciplinary committee of the FFSquash will be modified.
3. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served due to the decision of June 27, 2012.
4. All the results obtained at the event on February 11, 2012, will be canceled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
5. The decision will start on the date of notification.
6. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin