Facts
The French Football Federation (Fédération Française de Football, FFF) charges respondent M04 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on June 20, 2010, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. The analysis showed the presence of tuaminoheptane. Tuaminohetane is a prohibited substance according the World Anti Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The cause of the positive test was medication the respondent used to treat a cold. The medication is freely available in all drugstores.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one month in which respondent can't take part in competitions and sporting events organized or authorized by the FFF.
2. The period of ineligibility will be reduced by the period already served by the earlier decision, dated September 15, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFF.
3. The earlier decision dated September 15, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFF will not be modified.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Equestrian Federation (Fédération Française d'Équitation, FFE) charges respondent M86 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules.
During a concours on August 22, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent had used the prohibited substance three day before the doping test in a festivity setting. It was offered to her without knowing that it was prohibited, she argues that the low concentration indicates passive smoking. There was no intention by her to enhance sport performance. However the concentration is four times higher than the threshold value which indicates the consumption of cannabis.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of 6 months, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFE or the French equestrian society.
2. All the results obtained at August 22, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
4. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
5. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Fencing Federation (Fédération Française d'Escrime, FFE) charges respondent M41 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a Matsh on May 16, 2011, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent used the cannabis three days before the doping test during a festivity. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFE.
2. The decision, dated September 27, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFE will be modified.
3. The present decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Concours Landais (Fédération Française de la Course Landaise, FFCL) charges Respondent M102 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a concourse on August 19 and 20, 2010, the Respondent had to undergo a doping test, which he refused.

History
The respondent didn't agree about how the doping test was conducted because he was asked to produce urine in the sight of other sportsmen.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M82 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event samples were taken on October 3, 2010. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) which is regarded as a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent thinks that the positive tests derive from medication administered during an operation for faster recovery.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FCC and related French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification and will last till the end of the decision of March 24, 2011.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M79 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event samples were taken on October 3, 2010. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of: human chorionic gonadotrophin, modafinil (acid), betamethasone and dexamethasone. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent explained that the positve tests came from medication he used against narcolepsy - cataplexy and to treat injuries he had suffered from. He had no intention to enhance his sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the as pronounced by the decision, dated March 24, 2011, of the disciplinary committee of the FFC and extended to related French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification and will last till the end of the decision of March 24, 2011.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M66 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on August 29, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent explained that the positive test was caused by passive smoking of cannabis which helps him to deal with the Crohn's disease. There was no intention to enhance sport performance. However the athlete already had received sanction for two earlier Anti-Doping violations: February 2, 2006 (one year period of ineligibility) and July 25, 2007 (2 years period of ineligibility) for the adverse analytical finding of heptaminol.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of four years in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestations of the French sport federations.
2. All his results obtained at August 29, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M59 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on August 26, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on betamethasone, a metabolite of methylphenidate (ritalinic acid) and ephedrine. The substances are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list. Methylphenidate and ephedrine are regarded as specified substances.

History
The respondent explains that ha had used methylphenidate and ephedrine to regain his sporting level and to lose weight. The bethamethasone was used to treat a pain in his knee, for this he has a medical certificate. There was no intention to improve sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction in a period of ineligibility of one year in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC as pronounced in the decision, dated December 16, 2010, of the disciplinary committee of the FFC but extended to all French sport federations.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M28 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on August 11, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on triamcinolone. Triamcinolone is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent explained that the positive test was caused by medication used to treat a chronicial condition called allergic rhinitis.

Decision
1. The respondent is acquitted.
2. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M19 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on June 19, 2010, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on pseudoephedrine. Pseudoephedrine is a prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibited list and is regarded as a specified substance.

History
The respondent explained that the positive test was caused by medication used to treat a constant nasal obstruction.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which the athlete can't take part in competition or manifestions of the FFC, equal to the decision dated October 28, 2010 of the appeal committee of the FFC only extended to all French sport federations.
2. All his results obtained at June 19, 2010, are cancelled. Medals, points and prizes are withdrawn.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.