Facts
The French Federation of American Football (Fédération Française de Football Américain, FFFA) charges respondent M49 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on March 25, 2006, respondent didn't attend the doping control.

History
The respondent wanted to shower first before the doping control, there were showers at the doping control station. His request to use another facility was denied. Despite explaining the consequences the respondent left the scene. The sports director of the team had written a complaint about the late hour of the doping control.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the French sport federations.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Roller Skating Federation (Fédération Française de Roller Skating, FFRS) charges respondent M48 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 21, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The disciplinary committee of the FFRS had given, on April 26, 2006, a warning to the respondent.
The respondent had used cannabis the day before the doping test on a birthday celebration among friends.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFRS.
2. The present decision will start on the day of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Roller Skating Federation (Fédération Française de Roller Skating, FFRS) charges respondent M47 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 21, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't provide any information about how the prohibited substance had entered his body he also didn't attend the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFRS.
2. The present decision will start on the day of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Cycling Federation (Fédération Française de Cyclisme, FFC) charges respondent M46 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a cycling event on December 11, 2005, respondent provided a sample for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of betamethasone which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used a pharmaceutical product to treat a cold for which he holds a prescriptions from his physician.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of one year, from which 6 months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFC.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Powerboat Racing (Fédération Française de Motonautique, FFM) charges respondent M45 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During an event on September 25, 2005, the respondent didn't provide a valid sample for doping control.

History
The respondent was unable to provide enough urine for a valid doping sample. Due to returning to his residence on time by boat he couldn't stay to provide more.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestation organized or authorized by the FFM.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Weightlifting, Fitness, Powerlifting and Bodybuilding (Fédération Française d'Halterophilie, Musculation, Force Athlétique et Culturisme, FFHMFAC) charges respondent M44 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on November 12, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of metabolites of nandrolone and a metabolite of stanozolol. These substances are prohibited according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent didn't dispute the results, didn't send written comments and didn't attend the hearing.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of two years, from which one month conditionally, during this period respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFHMFAC.
2. The decision start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Rugby Federation (Fédération Française de Rugby, FFR) charges respondent M43 or a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on May 28, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The sample tested positive on a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent denies the use of cannabis and claims the positive test derives from passive smoking. He has testimonies as proof for this fact.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, for which two months conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFR.
2. The decision will start on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Taekwondo Federation (Fédération Française de Taekwondo, FFT) charges respondent M42 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on January 8, 2006, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. Analysis of the sample showed the presence of salbutamol which is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent had used medication to treat exercise induced asthma, however the high concentration measured is not in accordance with the medical use prescribed.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months in which the respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFT.
2. The earlier decision (6 months period of ineligibility) of the disciplinary committee, dated August 3, 2005, of the FFT, is cancelled.
3. The decision will start on the date of notification.
4. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Federation of Billiards (Fédération Française de Billard, FFB) charges respondent M41 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a contest on February 18, 2006, a sample was taken for doping control purposes. Analysis of the sample highlighted the presence of a metabolite of cannabis. Cannabis is a prohibited substance according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent admitted the use of cannabis in a social setting two days before the doping test in a social setting. There was no intention to enhance sport performance.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of three months, from which one month conditionally, in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized or authorized by the FFB.
2. The decision starts on the date of notification.
3. The decision will be published and sent to the parties involved.

Facts
The French Handball Federation (Fédération Française de Handball, FFHB) charges respondent M40 for a violation of the Anti-Doping Rules. During a match on October 9, 2005, a sample was taken for doping test purposes. The analysis of the sample showed the presence of prednisolone and prednisone which are prohibited substances according the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) prohibited list.

History
The respondent suffered from angina and took a pharmaceutical product for treatment. She had sent the medical prescription to the council.

Decision
1. The sanction is a period of ineligibility of six months in which respondent can't take part in competition or manifestations organized by the FFHB, as pronounced by the decision, dated January 10, 2006, by the disciplinary committee of the FFHB.
2. The decision will not be published.
3. The decision will be sent to the parties involved.