Decision of the Royal Dutch Soccer Association (KNVB). Due to a violation of the Anti-Doping Code the period of ineligibility will be from December 1, 2006, till March 1, 2007.
An appeal can be made within 14 days.

The Dutch Archery Association (Nederlandse Handboog Bond, NHB) has reported an anti doping rule violation against this person after he tested positive for the prohibited substance propranolol. The Person was selected by the anti-doping authorities to provide a urine sample at a competition in Belgium. Person stated to the DCO he had used paroxetine, propranolol and maxalt. Person filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the Committee.
Person stated that propranolol was prescribed and used for medical purposes. Person didn’t know the substance was prohibited and had no intention to enhance performances for competition. After tested positive person requested twice without success for dispensation, then decided to switch to another non prohibited drug for medical purposes.
The Disciplinary Committee concludes that person violated the anti-doping rules and, considering exceptional circumstances, decides to reprimand the person.
Fees and expenses for this committee shall be borne by person and NHB.

The defendant appeal against the decision of the disciplinary committee of the Royal Dutch Lawn Tennis Union (KNLTB) dated February 6, 2007. For which he was awarded with an ineligibility of two years.
The defendant claims not to be a part of the registered testing pool. For that reason he didn't attend the doping test. In his Appeal he states not to be aware of the consequences doing so, also he doubts the competence of the DCO.
Considering the doping rules of the KNLTB, particularly Section 22, paragraph 3, athletes not belonging to the registered testing pool should not be selected.
There is no reason to assume that defendant should have known he had to ask to be removed from the list (no Fault or Negligence).
The defendant refusal was permitted.
The appeal is granted, the decision of the Disciplinary Committee is set aside.
An appeal can be made within 21 days at the CAS.

Related case:
ISR 2011 KNWU Decision Appeal Committee 2011031 B
January 5, 2012

The Person didn't show after selection by the anti-doping authorities to supply a urine sample at a competition in Belgium.
The Royal Dutch Cycling Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandsche Wieler Unie, KNWU) notified the person of the doping violation and ordered a provisional suspension. Person filed a statement in his defence and was heard by the Committee.

Person stated he dropped out during the competition, signed out to the officials, and went home.
Person wasn’t informed by the officials about a doping control nor was he called for a doping control test. Selection by the anti-doping authorities started when person already had left the competition.

The committee concludes that person reasonably could not know or assume he was selected by the anti-doping authorities. Because of exceptional circumstances the Disciplinary Committee decides to reduce the ineligibility to 12 months, beginning on the date of his provisional suspension. Fees and expenses for this committee shall be borne by person and KNWU.

Facts
The Royal Netherlands Power Sport and Fitness Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandse Krachtsport en Fitnessfederatie, KNKF) has reported a violation of the Anti-Doping Code (ADC). Defendant was submitted to a out of competition doping test, the A-sample was positive for the substance 6ß-OH-methandienone (a metabolite of metandienone). The defendant didn't reply with a written defence the case was handled in writing.

Decision
The use of metandienone is a violation of the ADC section 3.
The award is an ineligibility period of 2 years commencing on the day of the decision.

Appealed case:
JBN 2011Decision Disciplinary Committee 2011034 T
August 25, 2011

Person appealed against the decision for ineligibility for 2 years, dated August 25, 2011, by the Judo Bond Nederland (JBN) Disciplinary Committee.
Person argued that the Disciplinary Committee ignored person’s statement about the supplement he used, and the committee’s decision for ineligibility without exceptional circumstances.
The Appeal Committee concluded that person gave a full statement about how a prohibited substance entered his body. Person didn’t know the supplement contained a prohibited stimulant ingredient, therefore person had no intention to enhance his performance.
The Appeal Committee finds person’s statement credible and decides to annul the Disciplinary Committee’s decision, for ineligibility for 2 years, because of exceptional circumstances.
The Appeal Committee therefore decides only to reprimand the person.

The Royal Dutch Billiards Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandse Biljart Bond, KNBB) has reported a violation of the Anti-Doping Code (ADC). On March 12, 2006, defendant was submitted to a doping test, the A-sample was positive for the substance propranolol.
The defendant replied with a written defence and attended the oral hearing on August 23, 2006.
The use of propranolol is a violation of the ADC section 3, sanction is mentioned in section 7.
The disciplinary committee is qualified to handle this case.
Due to a filing failure the prohibitted substance was called cocaine, this was corrected. A dispensation form was sent before the case started, but this form was declined. The defendant has proof he suffers from a heartcondition and the propranolol is in his medicine. Before the Section 3, paragraph 2 of the ADC mentions that the defendant is responsible for not taking prohibited substances. However his federation didn't inform him about this.
The award is a warning and a reprimand.
Within 14 days an appeal can be made.

Facts
The Royal Dutch Billiards Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandse Biljart Bond, KNBB) reported a violation of the Anti-Doping Code (ADC). Defendant was submitted to a doping test, the A-sample was positive for the substance cocaine. The defendant didn't reply with a written defence and didn't attend the oral hearing on August 23, 2006.

Decision
The use of cocaine is a violation of the ADC section 3.
The disciplinary committee is qualified to handle this case. The award is an ineligibility for the period of 2 years commencing on the date of the oral hearing, a fee is settled.

Related case:
JBN 2011 JBN Appeal Committee 2011034 B
December 29, 2011

The Judo Bond Nederland (JBN) has reported an anti doping rule violation against this person after he tested positive for methylhexaneamine (dimethylpentylamine).
Person filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the Committee.
Person stated he had used a supplement prior to fitness training and didn’t know it contained a prohibited stimulant. Person received the supplement from his brother, a medicine student. Person didn’t inquire about the ingredients in the supplement and stated he wasn’t informed about doping and supplements by the JBN.
The committee concluded that person violated the anti doping rules and didn’t accept person's statement about the supplement. Without mitigating circumstances the Disciplinary Committee declared the person ineligibility for competition for 2 years and disqualified his previous competition results.

Facts
The Royal Netherlands Strength Sport and Fitness Federation (Koninklijke Nederlandse Krachtsport en Fitnessfederatie, KNKF) reports defendant for violation of the Anti-Doping Code (ADC) of the ISR, section 5, paragraph 2. During a out of competition doping test the defendant wasn't at home after arranging his appointment with the DCO. The report of the violation dates March 31, 2006. The defendant has a written defence dated May 1, 2006, also he attended the oral hearing June 6, 2006.

History
The defendant had forgotten an appointment for that reason he wasn't at home, due to a domestic disturbance he couldn't stay at home and stayed elsewhere and got the messages of the DCO later.
The Disciplinary Committee is qualified to handle the report.

Decision
1. The violation of de ADC, section 5, paragraph 2 has been proven.
2. The disciplinary Committee renders the following decision: a suspension of 2 years dating from the day of the decision, a fee is settled. The period will not be reduced.

Appeal
An appeal can be made within 14 days.