NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Council 20167444 - Appeal

1 Jun 2017

Related case:

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167444
March 21, 2017

On 21 March 2017 the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decided to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Amfetamine.

Herafter the Athlete appealed the Decision with the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council which rendered a Decision in absentia of the Athlete.

The Disciplinary Council dismissed the Athlete's assertions against the Appealed Decision and upholds the findings of the Disciplinary Commission in First Instance.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council decides on 1 June 2017 to confirm the Decision of 21 March 2017.

Fees and expenses for this Council shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167444

21 Mar 2017

Related case:

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Council 20167444 - Appeal
June 1, 2017

In January 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substance Amfetamine. After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission.

The Athlete could not explain how the substance had entered his system nor could he demonstrate that the supplement he had purchased was the source of the positive test.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substance.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 21 March 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 26 January 2017.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167443

7 Mar 2017

In December 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substance Drostanolole. After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission.

The Athlete admitted that he had purchased and used a Fatstacker product for the purpose of weight loss. He stopped using the product after 2 months due to the side effects he experienced.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substance.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 7 March 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 22 December 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167442

7 Feb 2017

In November 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substances Drostanolone and Trenbolone. After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission.

The Athlete admitted the violation and stated that he had purchased in the United States supplements and used for the purpose of weight loss. One of the products was Halodrol that was labelled as 'Anabolique'.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substances.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 7 February 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 24 November 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167441

24 Jan 2017

In November 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substances Nandrolone and Stanozolol.

After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substances.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 24 January 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 24 November 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167440

24 Jan 2017

In November 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substance Clenbuterol.

After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete admitted that he had purchased and used the substance for the purpose of weight loss.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substance.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 24 January 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 24 November 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167439

24 Jan 2017

In November 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibted substance Trenbolone.

After Notification a provisional suspension was ordered. Because the Athlete failed to attend the hearing of the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission redered a decision in absentia of the Athlete.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that he intentionally had used the substance for fitness.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 24 January 2017to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 21 November 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167438

21 Mar 2017

In January 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the cyclist after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Testosterone. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission.

At first the Athlete denied that he was a sportsman submitted to Doping Control. However after he was confronted with the facts that he was mentioned in the results, in the bulletins and member of a cycling team, he acknowledged that he was an Athlete and sportsman and he accepted the test result.

The Disciplinaire Commission finds that the presence of a prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he had committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission deems that the Athlete intentionally had used the prohibited substance.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 21 March 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the Decision.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167437

7 Mar 2017

In September 2016 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the French cyclist for his Evasion and/or Refusal or Failure to submit to sample collection.

Consequenty in absentia of the Athlete the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decided on 6 December 2016 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete.

Hereafter in December 2016 the Athlete erroneously appealed the Decision with the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Council. The case was reopened and the Athlete was heard after the case was referred to the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission.

The Doping Control Officer (DCO) at the cycling competition in question reported that the Athlete was Notified but unable to produce a sample immediately. When requested to reappear later he failed to submit to sample collection. The DCO contacted the Athlete by telephone but again he failed to appear. After the competition the Athlete called the DCO and stated that he would not submit to sample collection.

The Athlete explained that at that time he was too much dehydrated to produce a sample and could not return to the competition because he lived in France and had to work the next day. He argued he had the intention to cooperate and asserted that under the French Rules he was allowed to submit to sample collection within 24 hours.

The Disciplinary Commission dismissed the Athlete's assertions and finds that at any time the Athlete had failed to provide an explanation to the DCO while he intentionally refused to return to the competition. Further the Athlete failed to demonstrate that under the French ADR there were provisions to submit to sample collection afterwards within 24 hours.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 7 March 2017 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 20 September 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2016 Disciplinary Commission 20167436

18 Oct 2016

In August 2016 NADO Flanders 2016 has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the tratlon Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (RhEPO).

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete admitted the violation and that he intentionally had purchased and injected the substance into his system.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that the he had committed an anti-doping rule violation. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 18 October 2016 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete, starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 25 August 2016.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin