NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176734

23 Jan 2018

In 2017 NADO Flanders reported two anti-doping rule violations against the Athlete for use and possession after an imported parcel was intercepted containing the prohibited substances Androsterone and Arimistane. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness. 

Considering the evidence in this case the Commission finds that the Athlete intentionally had committed the admitted anti-doping rule violations. Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 23 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176733

23 Jan 2018

In October 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the padel player after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Cocaine. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete admitted the use of Cocaine out-of-competition during a night out about 12 hours before the competititon in a context unrelated to sport performace. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the anti-doping rule violation. The Commission accepts that the violation was not intentional. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 23 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 26 October 2017.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176732

23 Jan 2018

In 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the boxer for his failure to submit to sample collection. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Disciplinary Commission already concluded that can’t be established that the Athlete was properly notified nor that he was sufficiently aware that he was selected for Doping Control. The Athlete acknowledged that the notification occurred after the match in the middle of row about the judging in favour of his opponent. 

Further the Commission established that the Doping Control Form in question mentioned deleted names of boxers while the last name mentioned on the Form was not the name of the Athlete. The Doping Control Officer confirmed that the identification of the selected boxer occurred chaotic, attributed to the organisation of the match, since the DCO's were not informed that for the boxing match the selected boxer had been replaced by the Athlete at the last minute . 

Therefore NADO Flanders Disciplinairy Commission decides on 23 January 2018 to acquit the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176731

9 Jan 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder for his refusal to submit to sample collection when requested at a competition. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted his refusal without any explanation. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the Athlete intentionally had committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation. Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 9 January 2018 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 November 2017. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176730

9 Jan 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder for his refusal to submit to sample collection when requested at a competition. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. The Athlete admitted the refusal because he was angry and disappointed about the judging at the competition. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the Athlete intentionally had committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation. Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 9 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 November 2017. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176729

9 Jan 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Trenbolone. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substance. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 9 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 November 2017. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176728

2 Jan 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder after his sample (collected in Belgium, outside Flanders) tested positive for the prohibitited substances Mesterolone and Tamoxifen. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete failed to attend the hearing of the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances has been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 17 November 2017.

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176727

2 Jan 2018

In June 2017 NADO Flanders reported two anti-doping rule violations against the Athlete for use and possession after an imported parcel was intercepted containing the prohibited substance Tamoxifen. Against the police and against the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission the Athlete admitted the purchase and use of the substance for fitness. 

Considering the evidence in this case the Commission finds that the Athlete intentionally had committed the anti-doping rule violations. Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on 14 June 2017. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176726

2 Jan 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Drostanolone. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission were he admitted the purchase and use of the substance.  

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance has been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 January 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 8 November 2017.  

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

History full circle: Novel' sympathomimetics in supplements

2 Nov 2015

History full circle: Novel' sympathomimetics in supplements / Nicolas Rasmussen, Peter H.J. Keizers. - (Drug Testing and Analysis 8 (2016) 3-4 (March-April); p. 283-286)

  • PMID: 27072841 
  • DOI: 10.1002/dta.1852 

Abstract

Since the banning of ephedrine in over-the-counter nutritional supplements a decade ago, a plethora of untested and/or unsafe sympathomimetic stimulants have taken its place. This paper argues that these 'novel' stimulants in supplements recapitulate the work of synthetic chemists at commercial pharmaceutical firms during the 1930s and 1940s, all seeking substitutes for recently successful products based on ephedrine and amphetamine.

 

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin