NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186754

26 Jun 2020

In 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Cocaine. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 26 June 2018 to impose a 1 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176753

26 Jun 2018

In 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Hydrochlorothiazide. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 26 June 2018 to impose a reprimand on the Athlete. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186752

29 May 2018

In 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Ephedrine. After notification the Athele was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Athlete admitted the violation and explained with medical evidence that he suffered from an allergy while previously in Spain he had a severe allergy attack and as treatment had used Efedrina Level medication purchased over-the-counter in a Spanish pharmacy.  

NADO Flanders deemed that that violation was not intentional and that the Athlete bears with No Significant Fault or Negligence. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission agrees that the violation was not intentional and that the Athlete acted with No Significant Fault or Negligence. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 29 May2018 to impose a reprimand on the Athlete and to disqualify his resuts. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176751

27 May 2018

In 2018 NADO Flanders has reported two anti-doping rule violations againt the bodybuilder for possession and use after a search in the his residence multiple prohibited substances were found: Boldenone, Drostanolone, Fluoxymesterone, Mesterolone, Methandienone, Nandrolone, Testosterone, Trenbolone including S2, S4 and S5 prohibited substances.

After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the possession and use of the substances for bodybuilding. 

The NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission finds that the Athlete has committed the admitted anti-doping rules violations and decides on 29 May 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176750

3 Apr 2018

NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the recreational Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Higenamine. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

NADO Flanders deemed that that violation was not intentional, that had been established that the supplement the Athlete had used contained the prohibited substance and that he mentioned the use of this supplement on the Doping Control Form. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission accepts that the violation was not intentional and that the Athlete acted with No Significant Fault or Negligence. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 3 April 2018 to impose a fine and a 3 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176749

3 Apr 2018

In January 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Nandrolone and Tamoxifen. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and he failed to attend the hearing of the  NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 3 April 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 25 January 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176748

3 Apr 2018

In January 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Methandienone. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and he was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substance for fitness. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 3 April 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 25 January 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176747

3 Apr 2018

In January 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete for his evasion or failure to submit to sample collection when requested. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

Here the Doping Control Officers (DCO) reported that at the fitness center the Athlete was duly notified about the upcoming Doping Control but he had to be convinced to sign the Noftification Form and he left the fitnesscenter through a side exit as noticed by the attending police officers assisting the DCO’s. The Athlete admitted the violation but denied that he intentionally evaded Doping Control. 

Considering the evidence the Disciplinary Commission finds that the Athelte intentionally committed the anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 3 April 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 18 January 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2017 Disciplinary Commission 20176746

3 Apr 2018

In November 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the bodybuilder after her samples - provided during two separate competitions - tested positive for Cannabis in a concentration above the WADA threshold (1.980 ng/ml). After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

NADO Flanders deems that the Athlete had established that the violation was not intentional, had used Cannabis out-of-competition in a context unrelated to sport performance. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substance had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that she committed an anti-doping rule violation. The Commission accepts that the violation was not intentional.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 3 April 2018 to impose a fine and a 6 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 22 November 2017. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186745

27 Mar 2018

In March 2017 the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decided to impose an 18 month period of ineligibility on the British boxer for committing an anti-doping rule violation. 

Hereafter NADO Flanders reported that the Athlete had participated in a boxing match overseas in December 2017 as breach of the imposed ineligibility. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Athlete admitted the violation, acknowledged that he was aware that he was sanctioned and that through his participation he would breach ineligibility. He was invited for the boxing match as charity and choose to follow the information from the World Boxing Association (WBA) nevertheless the imposed sanction had wordwide effect. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the breach of ineligibility had been established and that the Athlete was fully aware that he had violated the ineligibility.

Therefore the NADO Flanders decides on 27 March 2018 to impose a fine and an additional 18 month period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date the current period of ineligibility will end: i.e. on 5 June 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin