NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186764

16 Oct 2018

In June 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Drostanolone and Stanozolol.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 16 October 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 27 June 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186763

2 Oct 2018

In July 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Mesterolone, Metenolone, Methandienone, Stanozolol and Tamoxifen.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 October 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 19 July 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186762

2 Oct 2018

In July 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Drostanolone and Stanozolol including class S4 prohibited substances.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness and to recover from an injury. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 October 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 19 July 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186761

2 Oct 2018

In July 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances 1-Testosterone, Androstenedione, Clenbuterol, Metenolone, Oxandrolone, Stanozolol and Trenbolone including class S4 prohibited substances.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed the admitted anti-doping rule violation.

The Commission holds that previously in July 2010 the Athlete was sanctioned for committing an anti-doping rule violation and as a result he now has committed a second anti-doping rule violation. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 October 2018 to impose a fine and a 8 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 5 July 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186760

2 Oct 2018

In 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the golf player for evading sample collection after been notified by NADO Flanders during a competition. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Doping Control Officers (DCO’s) reported that the Athlete was duly notified and that he had signed the Notification Form. Hereafter the Athlete failed to attend the Doping Control for sample collection because he had left the competition nor did he respond the telephone calls. Afterwards the Athlete contacted the DCO but it appeared that he already went back home and it was too late to provide a sample. 

The Athlete asserted that he received an unclear Notification and he was unaware thereupon he had to attend himself the Doping Control Station while instead he continued playing golf. He explained that during golf he was interrupted by a telephone call from his girl friend that emotionally ended in a relation break off. After that the battery of his mobile phone was empty when he returned home and only at home he discovered the missed calls about the Doping Control. 

Considering the Athlete’s explanations the Disciplinary Commission holds that there are several inconsistencies in the Athlete’s story regarding the Notification, his phone call he had that day and his written submissions. Consequently the Commission concludes that there was no alleged language problem regarding the Notification, nor a valid compelling justification that prevented him to provide a sample. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 2 October 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186759

27 Nov 2018

On 4 September 2018 the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decided to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete after he tested positive for S1 and S4 class prohibited substances. Hereafter the proceeding continued to hear the parties. 

The Athlete admitted the purchase and use of the substances for bodybuilding but claimed that at the time of the Doping Control in the fitness center he was wasn’t there as Athlete nor practicing sport and accordingly not subjected to the Anti-Doping Rules. 

The Doping Control Officers (DCO’s) reported that in the fitness center the Athlete was duly notified about the Doping Control and that he had signed the Notification Form without issues. Although the Athlete is an employee at the fitness center he was in sportswear and clearly practicing sport in the company of other sportsmen. Additional evidence establish that the Athlete is also a member of a Sports Federation and on social media he posted pictures as bodybuiling with results of his training. 

Considering the evidence the Disciplinary Commission deems that NADO Flanders demonstrated that the Athlete is subjected to the Anti-Doping Rules and Doping Control. In addition the Commission finds that the presence of prohibited substances has been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation. 

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 27 November 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 7 June 2018.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186758

17 Jul 2018

In 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Enobosarm (ostarine), LGD-4033 and RAD140.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he admitted the purchase and use of the substances for fitness.  

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 17 July 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 7 June 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186757

17 Jul 2018

In 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Vilanterol. After notification the Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission. 

The Athlete explained with medical information that he had used the substance as prescribed medication for his condition although a TUE application was dismissed. Further NADO Flanders deems that the violations was not intentional and that the Athlete acted with No Significant Fault or Negligence. 

Considering the circumstances in this case the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 17 July 2018 to impose a reprimand on the Athlete without a fine. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186756

17 Jul 2018

In June 2018 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Athlete after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substances Methandienone, Nandrolone and Trenbolone including a high T/E ratio.

After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he accepted the test result and could not explain how the substances had entered his system. 

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibited substances had been established in the Athlete’s sample and accordingly that he committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 17 July 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. on 7 June 2018. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

NADO Flanders 2018 Disciplinary Commission 20186755

17 Jul 2018

In May 2017 NADO Flanders has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the cyclist after his sample tested positive for the prohibited substance Recombinant Erythropoietin (RhEPO). After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete was heard for the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission where he accepted the test result and could not explain how the substance entered his system.

The Disciplinary Commission finds that the presence of the prohibted substance has been established in the Athlete's sample and accordingly that he has committed an anti-doping rule violation.

Therefore the NADO Flanders Disciplinary Commission decides on 17 July 2018 to impose a fine and a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the decision. 

Fees and expenses for this Commission shall be borne partially by the Athlete.

Category
  • Legal Source
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin