Welcome

Welcome to Doping.nl, the Anti-Doping Knowledge Center.
This site has been established to host information about doping in the broadest sense of the word, and about doping prevention.

Initiator
The Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands (the Dutch Doping Authority for short) established this site and maintains it. The Doping Authority was founded in 1989 and it is one of the oldest NADOs in the world. Doping.nl was developed with financial support from the Dutch Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sport.

Goals
This website  was established because of the importance that the Doping Authority and the Ministry attach to the dissemination of information relevant to doping prevention. Disclosing and supplying relevant information is one of the cornerstones in the fight against doping in sport. However, in practice, a significant amount of information is still not available, or only available to a limited group of users. We therefore decided to bring together all the relevant information in a single site: Doping.nl.

Activities
The Doping Authority aims to supply as much information through this website as possible on an ongoing basis. The information will be varied but will focus primarily on: WADA documents like the World Anti-Doping Code, the International Standards like the Prohibited List, Doping Regulations, scientific articles and abstracts, decisions by disciplinary bodies (mainly CAS decisions).As well as making documents available, the Doping Authority aims to supply searchable documents when possible, and to add relevant keywords to ensure easy access.
In the future, Doping.nl will also become a digital archive containing older information that is no longer available elsewhere.

Target readers
This site has been designed for use by anti-doping professionals such as National Anti-Doping Organisations and International Federations but also for students, journalists and other people interested in the subject.

Register
To use the lightbox option, you need to register.

More information explaining how to use this website can be found under "help".

Recently added documents More »

ISR 2018 KNKF Decision Appeal Committee 2018005 B

Related case: ISR 2018 KNKF Decision Disciplinary Committee 2018005 T October 22, 2018 On 22 October 2018 the ISR-KNKF Disciplinary Committee decided to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Person, after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Clomiphene. In this case the Doping Authority Netherlands (Dopingautoriteit) reported this anti-doping rule violation within the time limit since the Royal Dutch Strength Sport and Fitness Federation (KNKF) refrained from doing this and neither imposed a provisional suspension. Here the Person failed to file a statement in his defence nor did he request to be heard for the ISR-KNKF Disciplinary Committee. The case was settled based on the filed submissions. Hereafter in November 2018 the Dopingautoriteit appealed the first instance decision with the ISR-KNKF Appeal Committee. In this appeal the Person did not file a statement in his defence. The Dopingautoriteit requested for a reduced sanction and contended that the ISR-KNKF Disciplinary Committee in first instance erroneously imposed a 4 year period of ineligibility due to there was no evidence that the violation was intentional. Further the Dopingautoriteit contended that in the absence of a provisional suspension under the Rules the imposed sanction had to start on the date of the decision, i.e. 22 October 2018, and not on 5 November 2018. The ISR-KNKF Appeal Committee agrees with the Dopingautoriteit and decides on 10 April 2019 to reduce the sanction and to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Person starting on 22 October 2018. Fees and expenses for this committee shall be borne by the ISR.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

NZRU 2018 DFSNZ vs Curtis Rountree

In 2015 the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe) informed DFSNZ about the results of Medsafe’s investigation into an internet drug supplier NZ Clenbuterol and provided DFSNZ details about the internet purchase in 2015 of a prohibited substance made by the rugby player Curtis Rountree. Hereafter in August 2018 Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) has reported two anti-doping rule violations against Curtis Rountree for the use and possession of the prohibited substance Clenbuterol. The Athlete had left New Zealand for Australia in March 2017 and after notification the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) and DFSNZ made efforts to contact the Athlete. Here the Athlete’s father confirmed the receipt of the submitted documents and that the Athlete had admitted that he had purchased “something” 3 years ago. The Athlete failed respond, to file any statement in his defence nor did he attend the hearing of the New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee. The Committee deems that the Athlete was duly notified about the reported anti-doping rule violations and that the evidence established that he purchased the substance Clenbuterol in February 2015. The New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee considers that there were substantial delays in the proceedings not attributed to the Athlete and decides on 25 February 2019 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting backdated on 21 August 2018.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

NZRU 2018 DFSNZ vs Glen Beadle

In 2015 the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe) informed DFSNZ about the results of Medsafe’s investigation into an internet drug supplier NZ Clenbuterol and provided DFSNZ details about the internet purchase in 2014 of a prohibited substance made by the rugby player Glen Beadle. Hereafter in October 2018 Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) has reported two anti-doping rule violations against Glen Beadle for the use and possession of the prohibited substance Clenbuterol. After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived his right to be heard, accepted a provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by DFSNZ. The parties in this case reached an agreement and filed a joint memorandum in relation to the sanction for approval into a decision of the New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee. The Committee considers that the Athlete gave a prompt admission and that there were substantial delays in the proceedings not attributed to the Athlete. Therefore the New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee decides on 27 February 2019 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting backdated on 26 October 2017.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

NZRU 2018 DFSNZ vs Carlos Rimene

In 2015 the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe) informed DFSNZ about the results of Medsafe’s investigation into an internet drug supplier NZ Clenbuterol and provided DFSNZ details about the internet purchase in 2015 of a prohibited substance made by the rugby player Carlos Rimene. Hereafter in October 2018 Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) has reported two anti-doping rule violations against Carlos Rimene for the use and possession of the prohibited substance Clenbuterol. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was heard for the New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee. The Athlete gave a prompt admission, accepted the provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by DFSNZ. The Committee considers that the Athlete gave a prompt admission and that there were substantial delays in the proceedings not attributed to the Athlete. Therefore the New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee decides on 25 February 2019 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting backdated on 26 October 2017.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

NZRU 2018 DFSNZ vs Tautini Hopa

In 2015 the New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe) informed DFSNZ about the results of Medsafe’s investigation into an internet drug supplier NZ Clenbuterol and provided DFSNZ details about the internet purchase in 2015 of a prohibited substance made by the rugby player Tautini Hopa. Hereafter in October 2018 Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFSNZ) has reported two anti-doping rule violations against Tautini Hopa for the use and possession of the prohibited substance Testosterone. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered and the Athlete failed to file a statement in his defence. When contacted by DFSNZ the Athlete admitted the violation, waived his right to be heard, accepted the provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by DFSNZ. The New Zealand Rugby Union Judicial Committee considers that there were substantial delays in the proceedings not attributed to the Athlete and decides on 21 March 2019 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting backdated on 26 April 2018.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

iNADO Update #2019-4

iNADO Update (2019) 4 (18 April) Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations (iNADO) ____________________________________________________ Link: https://mailchi.mp/3ac1b4c192eb/inado-update-2018-2232317?e= Contents: - iNADO Acknowledges Outstanding Contribution of Ieva Lukosiute-Stanikuniene - iNADO Webinar (1) - 25 April 2019 - iNADO Webinar (2) - 6 May 2019 - International Standard for Education: Tips from UKAD for your Programme - Parent Involvement? ASADA´s Guideline can serve you as a Model - Bosnia and Herzegovina: Doping Control Samples taken in European Youth Olympic Festival - 30 Years of Anti-Doping in Poland -Research Article: Performance Modelling and Anti-Doping - World Players Association demands Equal Say for Athletes to legitimize Global Anti-Doping - Open Letter by "Global Athlete" to all Athletes attending the IOC Forum - The Leniency Rule as additional Tool in Anti-Doping? - Athletes Germany suggest to think about Doping Controls for ASP - New at the Anti-Doping Knowledge Center

FA 2018 Football Association vs Joshua Yorwerth

In December 2018 the English Football Association (FA) has reported 2 anti-doping rule violations against the player Joshua Yorwerth for his use of Cocaine and for his evasion or refusal / failure to submit to sample collection during an out of competition doping test at the Athlete’s home. After notification a provisional suspension was ordered. The Athlete filed a statement in his defence and was heard for the FA Regulatory Commission. The Athlete admitted both violations and requested for a reduced sanction. He stated that he has a problem with alcohol that triggered his use of Cocaine. His use of Cocaine in the weekend was the reason for not answering the door on Tuesday thereafter when the doping officials arrived to test him. He offered his apology for his conduct and stated that he had already been counselled and had consulted a psychologist for his problem. The Panel finds that the violations were admitted and considers the Athlete’s degree of fault in this case. The Panel deems that when tested positive for Cocaine the Athlete would face a maximum suspension of 3 months. Due to his evasion of the test he would now face a career-wrecking suspension of 4 years. Therefore the FA Regulatory Commission decides on 19 February 2019 to impose a 4 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete for his evasion of the doping test starting on the date of the provisional suspension, i.e. 3 October 2018. Further a warning is imposed on the Athlete for his use of Cocaine and payment ordered of a fee and the costs incurred by the Regulatory Commission.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

UKAD 2018 UKAD vs Sonny Webster

On 7 November 2017 a 4 year period of ineligibility was imposed on the weightlifter Sonny Webster after he tested positive for the prohibited substance Ostarine. In Adition the United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) reported that the Mr Webster in October 2017 had breached the terms of the provisional suspension. However here the verdict was that training at a gym with another BWLA athlete was not a breach of his provisional suspension. Hereafter in June 2018 UKAD reported that Mr Webster had been assisting Athletes as an Athlete Support Person during the imposed period of ineligibility. In addition UKAD issued Prohibited Association Letters to 3 weightlifters on the basis that they had been receiving coaching assistance during this period. When interviewed Mr Webster admitted that he had provided assistance to a number of Athletes and asserted that he did not personally attend any competitions or events with the Athletes he assisted. Mr Webster acknowledged that he failed to inform any of the Athletes that he was prohibited from providing coaching assistance during his period of ineligibility. Therefore UKAD decides on 26 February 2019 that Mr Webster has committed a violation of the prohibition from assisting Athletes. Consequently a new period of ineligibility of 3 years is imposed starting on 14 June 2021.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

IAAF 2018 IAAF vs Samson Munga Kagia

In November 2018 the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Kenyan Athlete Samsom Munga Kagia. After notification the Athlete gave a prompt admission, waived his right to be heard, accepted the provisional suspension and the sanction proposed by the IAAF. Therefore the IAAF Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) decides on 27 February 2019 to impose a 2 year period of ineligibility on the Athlete starting on the date of the sample collection, i.e. on 14 October 2018.

show » details »
Type:
pdf

IAAF 2018 IAAF vs Davinder Singh Kang

Related case: ADDPI 2017_21 INADA vs Davinder Singh Kang April 23, 2018 In May 2018 the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) has reported an anti-doping rule violation against the Indian Athlete Davinder Singh Kang after his A and B samples tested positive for the prohibited substances 5α-Adiol and 5β-Adiol. After notification the Athlete filed a statement in his defence and he was scheduled to be heard for the IAAF Disciplinary Tribunal. On 14 February 2019, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) advised the IAAF that it was conducting a review of the analytical performance of the New Delhi Laboratory, including in connection with the Adverse Analytical Finding. In light of this ongoing review, WADA suggested to the IAAF, in the interest of fairness to the parties, that the Athlete's hearing be adjourned whilst WADA completed its review of the Laboratory. On 1 March 2019, the New Delhi Laboratory and WADA reported that the issued AAF was withdrawn after review of the analytical results. WADA considered the case closed and notified the IAAF to discontinue the disciplinary proceedings against the Athlete with immediate effect. On 7 March 2019 the IAAF Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) decided to withdraw its Notice of Charge and to acquit the Athlete.

show » details »
Type:
pdf
Category
  • Legal
  • Education
  • Science
  • Statistics
  • History
Country & language
  • Country
  • Language
Other filters
  • ADRV
  • Legal Terms
  • Sport/IFs
  • Other organisations
  • Laboratories
  • Analytical aspects
  • Doping classes
  • Substances
  • Medical terms
  • Various
  • Version
  • Document category
  • Document type
Publication period
Origin